-2
$\begingroup$

With $u^\alpha v^\beta$ the components of two vector fields, is

$$u^\alpha v^\alpha=u^1v^1+u^2v^2+u^3v^3+u^4v^4$$

a scalar invariant under a Lorentz-transformation? And why?

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ No, in general that won't be an invariant. Are you mixing it up with the norm, which is an invariant? If not can you give us some idea of the background to your question? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2017 at 10:58
  • $\begingroup$ Actually there is no background to the question. I just failed it on an exam and I do not understand what I shall have done. Also I'm new on this website. $\endgroup$
    – Charles
    Commented Nov 17, 2017 at 11:01
  • $\begingroup$ No, but $u^\alpha v_\alpha$ would have been an invariant. $\endgroup$
    – Photon
    Commented Nov 17, 2017 at 11:06
  • $\begingroup$ Can you explain me why ? $\endgroup$
    – Charles
    Commented Nov 17, 2017 at 11:10
  • $\begingroup$ Depending on the index position the components transform differently. If you don't want to dive into transformation properties of lower index components, you can also use that $v_\alpha=\eta_{\alpha\beta}v^\beta$ and $\eta_{\alpha\beta}=\eta_{\gamma\delta}\Lambda^\gamma_\alpha\Lambda^\delta_\beta$ $\endgroup$
    – Photon
    Commented Nov 17, 2017 at 11:15

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

First note that your expression of $u^{\alpha}v^{\alpha}$ is wrong. Einstein summation convention tell you that you sum if an index appears twice - once up and once down. Thus, in fact

$$u^{\alpha}v_{\alpha}=u^1v_1+u^2v_2+u^3v_3+u^4v_4$$

The quantity $u^\alpha v^\beta$, on the other hand, is a tensor of rank $(2,0)$, which can be represented by a $4\times 4$ matrix

$$\begin{pmatrix}u^1v^1&u^1v^2&u^1v^3&u^1v^4\\u^2v^1&u^2v^2&u^2v^3&u^2v^4\\u^3v^1&u^3v^2&u^3v^3&u^3v^4\\u^4v^1&u^4v^2&u^4v^3&u^4v^4\end{pmatrix}$$

so by writing $u^\alpha v^\alpha$ you refer to its diagonal elements.

Second, you are confusing upper and lower indices. The location of the index determines its transformation properties. Take for example a vector $v^\alpha$, it transform in the following manner

$$v^{\alpha^\prime}=\frac{\partial x^{\alpha^\prime}}{\partial x^\alpha}v^\alpha$$

On the other hand, a co-vector $u_{\alpha}$ transforms differently

$$u_{\alpha^\prime}=\frac{\partial x^{\alpha}}{\partial x^{\alpha^\prime}}u_{\alpha}$$

In your case, the quantity $u^\alpha v^\beta$ transform like this

$$u^{\alpha^\prime} v^{\beta^\prime}=\frac{\partial x^{\alpha^\prime}}{\partial x^\alpha}\frac{\partial x^{\beta^\prime}}{\partial x^\beta}u^\alpha v^\beta$$

and in particular, the diagonal elements

$$u^{\alpha^\prime} v^{\alpha^\prime}=\frac{\partial x^{\alpha^\prime}}{\partial x^\alpha}\frac{\partial x^{\alpha^\prime}}{\partial x^\beta}u^\alpha v^\beta$$

In general, it is not invariant under the Lorentz transformations. However, the quantity $u^\alpha v_\alpha$ has no free indices since you sum over $\alpha$, and thus it remains invariant under transformations. You can also see it by transforming $u^\alpha$ and $v_\alpha$ separately

$$u^{\alpha^\prime}v_{\alpha^\prime}=\frac{\partial x^{\alpha^\prime}}{\partial x^\beta}u^\beta\frac{\partial x^{\gamma}}{\partial x^{\alpha^\prime}}v_\gamma=\frac{\partial x^{\gamma}}{\partial x^\beta}u^\beta v_\gamma=\delta^{\gamma}_{\beta}u^\beta v_\gamma=u^\beta v_\beta$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.