In the context of statistical field or quantum field theory, one encounters so called generating function(al) for connected correlations, aka the following function(al):
$$ W(J) = \ln (Z(J))$$
$$ Z(J) = \int \mathcal{D} \phi e^{-S[\phi]}$$
From a probabilistic standpoint, Z(J) is just the moment generating function(al) while $\ln Z$ is the cumulant generating function(al), I think one generates $\langle \phi^2 \rangle$ for example and the other generates $\langle (\phi - \langle \phi \rangle)^2 \rangle$.
However, we further define another generating function(al), call $\Gamma(\phi)$ usually called the "Effective Action" defined via legendre transform of the function(al) $W(J)$.
- Why is $\Gamma[\phi]$ the effective action a useful quantity to calculate?
- What is the probabilistic interpretation of the 1PI diagrams it generates? (cumulant, variance etc...).
If correlation functions tell me how lab measurements of $\phi(x)$ and $\phi(y)$ at space/time points x/y would correlate, what do the 1PI functions generated by $\Gamma$ physically represent?
Bonus question! The convex nature of the functional W(J) (the fact the Hessian $${\delta^2 \over \delta J(x) \delta J(y)} W(J) > 0 \forall x, y$$) ensures that the legendre transform is bijective. How do we motive this fact physically? Are there cases when this is not true and the effective action is no longer a useful quantity?
Any discussion of the intuition about the quantity $\Gamma[\phi]$ would help, even if it is in the lower dimensional case where $\phi$ is not a field but a single random variable for example.