The answer to this question is no assuming dimensions higher than 1+1. This can be seen observing that the equation of motion for the fermionic field is just the limit of mass going to infinity of a scalar field coupled to a fermionic field. This can be seen in the following way. Consider the Lagrangian
$$
L = \frac{1}{2}(\partial\phi)^2-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2+\bar\psi(i\gamma\cdot\partial-g\phi)\psi.
$$
The equations of motion are easily obtained to be
$$
\partial^2\phi+m^2\phi=g\bar\psi\psi\qquad (i\gamma\cdot\partial-g\phi)\psi=0.
$$
The equation of the scalar field can be immediately integrated to give
$$
\phi=g\int d^Dx\Delta(x-y)\bar\psi(y)\psi(y)
$$
with the propagator that of a free particle. This propagator, in the limit of a very large mass of the scalar field, is just proportional to $\delta^D(x-y)$. This observation is crucial for the following. So, we are left with the equation
$$
(i\gamma\cdot\partial-\kappa\bar\psi\psi)\psi=0
$$
where $\kappa$ is a constant that depends on the parameters $m$ and $g$ of the Lagrangian we started from. In this way we have recovered the equation proposed by the OP but we have just proved that this is the large mass limit of a scalar field coupled to a fermion field.
Now, we do quantum field theory on the initial Lagrangian and write down the partition function as
$$
Z[j,\bar\eta,\eta]=\int[d\phi][d\bar\psi][d\psi]e^{i\int d^Dx\left[\frac{1}{2}(\partial\phi)^2-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2+\bar\psi(i\gamma\cdot\partial-g\phi)\psi\right]}
e^{i\int d^Dx\left[j\phi+\bar\eta\psi-\bar\psi\eta\right]}.
$$
The fermion part can be immediately integrated generating a potential to the scalar field in the form
$$
V(\phi)=-i{\rm tr}\ {\rm ln}\left[i\gamma\cdot\partial-g\phi\right]_{(x,x)}.
$$
This can be evaluated by a loop expansion as
$$
V(\phi)=-g_1\phi^3-g_2\phi^4+\ldots.
$$
Now, independently on the value of the mass of the scalar field and the presence of a finite v.e.v., using Derrick theorem we know that stationary localized solutions to a nonlinear wave equation or nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation in dimensions three and higher are unstable. This concludes the proof that the model equation yielded by the OP does not have soliton solutions in dimensions three and higher. In dimensions 1+1 these can exist.