10
$\begingroup$

If there is a hot cup of tea and we were asked to add milk and sugar, which mixing order would make the hottest tea?

I personally think that the order doesn't matter, since sugar wouldn't change the temperature of the tea before or after milk. Is it true?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ More posts on milk: physics.stackexchange.com/search?q=is%3Aq+milk $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Apr 24, 2016 at 10:51
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The sugar must change the temperature. Otherwise the question makes no sense. The fact that it won't change a lot, is immaterial since the question addresses the super-anal audience anyway. Actually, they mean that sugar has higher temperature and less thermal capacity. So, it will reduce the temparture less than milk. That is their point, I believe. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 24, 2016 at 11:14
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Just in case somebody is interested in a practical consideration, sugar dissolves faster the higher the temperature. So if you're looking to keep your colleagues happy... $\endgroup$
    – l0b0
    Commented Apr 24, 2016 at 13:12
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Assuming the tea is hot and the milk is cold, adding the sugar first has the benefit of it dissolving better in a hotter solution $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 24, 2016 at 13:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I was expecting this question to take me to cooking, but instead I'm in physics... weird. $\endgroup$
    – Pharap
    Commented Apr 25, 2016 at 3:22

5 Answers 5

6
$\begingroup$

The fact that sugar does not change the temperature can be true but this means that the time it takes to dissolve the sugar is important. The coffee will cool down exponentially all the time. Then, you drop the milk, which additionally reduces the temperature. But, mixing milk with coffee takes no time. So it will me immediate drop of temperature by some degree.

You can also drop both together and wait until sugar dissolves in the colder beverage. I think this is exactly the flipped order scenario. The milk, dropped into the hotter tea, causes more degrees to drop immediately because, say, when it is as cold as milk, the milk won't cool it down at all. I think that this is because you have an average energy between two masses, of tea and milk. Temperature is proportional to the energy, $$T_\textrm{mixed} = {MT_M + mT_m\over M+m}= {kmT_M+mT_m \over km+m}= {kT_M + T_m\over k+1}.$$

I think that sugar-first gives you higher temperature because in the first scenario you have shorter period of sugar melting, followed by some degrees lost due to milk. In second scenario, you first lose more degrees due to milk and then will have longer period of sugar melting, which again makes more degrees lost during the melting stage (compared to melting state in the scenario 1). So, since every of two phases causes more dramatic temperature loss in scenario №2, you will end up in colder liquid.


It is difficult to prove formally.

In the first scenario, you have t1 seconds to dissolve the sugar so that temperature drops from T10 to T11 and then additionally drops by T1m.

In the second, initial T20 is reduced by milk to T20-T2m which further exponentially reaches some end temperature during t2 seconds.

The temperature is decaying exponentially, proportionally to the difference between cup and room temperature, something like $T(T_0, t) = T_r + (T_0-T_r) e^{-at}$ where $T_r$ is the room temperature and t is current time since the beginning of experiment.

Let's have some amount of sugar m, which is solving at speed dm/dt = b*T(t), that is, we loose the sugar proportionally to the temperature. Integrating over time, we can figure out when all sugar is dissolved, $$\int_0^t kT(T_\textrm{fresh}, t)dt = \int_0^t T_r dt + \int_0^t T_r dt + \Delta T \int_0^t e^{-at}dt = T_rt + \Delta T {b\over a}(1-e^{-at}) =m.$$ We need to find out the $t$ such that the dissolved amount of sugar amounts to $m$. For me, $at + e^{bt} = c$ is quite difficult to solve for $t$. But, if you can, we know the time it takes to dissolve the sugar and can proceed and find the temperature we have at that point, $T_\textrm{sweet} = T(T_\textrm{fresh}, t)$ and finally $T_\text{sugar+milk}=(kT_\textrm{sweet}+T_m)/(k+1)$.

In the second scenario, we first find $T_\textrm{milked} = (kT_\textrm{fresh}+T_m)/(k+1)$, compute sweetening time $t_2$ given $T_r t_2 + (T_\textrm{milked}-T_r){b\over a}(1-e^{at_2}) =m $, taking temperature after $t_2$ seconds, $T_\text{milk + sugar} = T(T_\textrm{milked}, t_2)$

I can hardly contrast $T_\text{sugar+milk}$ with $T_\text{milk + sugar}$.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Edited because I had misread the question

If the goal is to keep the tea hot, you add the milk first. This will bring the temperature of the tea down by some amount $\Delta T$, and the cooler tea will now lose heat more slowly while you dissolve the sugar. I am assuming that since you cannot see the sugar in the milky tea, you will do what I do - you add it, and give a "fixed time stir" (about three turns).

If you add the milk after dissolving the sugar, the tea will have spent greater time at the higher temperature; in the process it will have lost more heat (almost all heat is lost by evaporation, which is very temperature dependent: hot air can contain far more moisture as described by the Clausius-Clapeyron equation, and evaporation is limited by how much moisture is carried away. )

Add the milk first. Don't blow on the tea.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Wouldn't it be better to add the milk first such that the integrated heat loss through evaporation is lower? The milk has to be warmed up in either case, although a less the colder the tea is already. Seems that one needs a more careful estimation, altogether :-/. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 24, 2016 at 20:12
  • $\begingroup$ @MartinUeding if the goal is to cool the tea down, you wait (greater heat loss when temperature difference is larger). If you want the tea to stay warm, you add it first. $\endgroup$
    – Floris
    Commented Apr 24, 2016 at 20:23
4
$\begingroup$

If the processes are instantaneous, and you drink the tea at once after that, then it doesnt matter.

A more interesting question would be, when to put the milk in the tea. Now it does matter if you wait first and then add the milk and drink - or if you add it at once and then wait and drink. Do you see, why?

Also, in your formulation "you were asked to put milk or sugar in the tea". If you have to chose, then milk will usually have the higher thermal capacity.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

It needs energy to solve sugar in water because the enthalpy of solvent (water) and solute (sugar) is lower than the enthalpy of the final solution, solving is an endothermic reaction in this case[1]. Milk has already some sugar in it, the (in)famous lactose, so the enthalpy of tea+milk might be higher than the enthalpy of tea alone and the order "milk first, than sugar" can result in a slightly hotter tea. Assuming sugar and milk have the same temperature, of course and get added in the same amount in and at the same time.

[1] it is a bit more complicated than that. Obvious by asking the question how an endothermic reaction can be spontaneous.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Assuming sugar and milk have the same temperature, of course and get added in the same amount" You must drink your tea either very sweet or very dark. And who keeps their sugar in the fridge? $\endgroup$
    – Dan Hulme
    Commented Apr 25, 2016 at 8:36
  • $\begingroup$ Using a kitchen-scale a heaped tbls of sugar is about 6 gr and a dash of milk about 15 gr, and with two tbls of sugar the tea gets indeed a bit sweet. BTW in areas with very high humidity the fridge is actually a good place to store small amounts of sugar for your daily dose of infusion. A tight container is better, no question, but every time you open the lid a small amount of humidity slips in which will end in somebody trying to make up an explanation for the stickiness of the pointy-end of the fire axe. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 25, 2016 at 16:12
1
$\begingroup$

The order doesn't matter. The reason is conservation of energy. The tea, milk, and sugar before the mixing have some initial energy, and the final tea will have some energy that depends only on its state (the tea doesn't have any kind of memory of how it got to that state). The energy difference between these two states is the additional energy associated with mixing in the sugar and milk, and will affect the change the final temperature. Because the energy change depends only on the final and initial states, the temperature will be the same regardless of what order you mix them in (assuming the sugar is well-dissolved).

$\endgroup$
9
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Though how much you mix it does matter, as it adds energy. $\endgroup$
    – jpa
    Commented Apr 24, 2016 at 12:47
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The order of tea and milk does make a noticeable difference and led to developments in the design of experiments and the Fisher's Exact Test: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_tasting_tea $\endgroup$
    – Henry
    Commented Apr 24, 2016 at 20:25
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Energy is only conserved in closed systems. The cup and dissipation of steam are not part of the system. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 24, 2016 at 20:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Tea does have a memory, because it has a state: its temperature. Let's use period 'B' (for 'between') to denote the period when milk has been added but sugar has not (or vice versa.) During period 'B', the tea will be cooling down. As always, the rate it cools is dependent on the current temperature. If milk, say, cools the tea more than sugar, than the amount the tea cools during period B will be less if milk is added first. So adding milk first results in tea that is warmer at the end of the process. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 24, 2016 at 22:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If conservation of energy applied in the way you say, the tea would never get cold. $\endgroup$
    – Dan Hulme
    Commented Apr 25, 2016 at 8:35

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.