3
$\begingroup$

I am trying to find the eigenstates/eigenvalues of the following Hamiltonian $$ \hat{H} = \hbar \omega \Big(\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}+\frac{1}{2}\Big)+A\big(\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}^{\dagger}+\hat{a}\hat{a}\big)\equiv \hat{H}_1+\hat{H}_2, $$ where $\hat{a}$ and $\hat{a}^{\dagger}$ are the standard ladder operators, with $[\hat{a}, \hat{a}^{\dagger}] = 1$.

My attempt

(1) I tried to check whether the two terms were commuting, to see if the problem admitted a separable solution, but $\big[\hat{H}_1, \hat{H}_2\big]= \hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}^{\dagger}-\hat{a}\hat{a}$.

(2) I tried the trial solution (even states) $$ |\phi\rangle = \sum_n c_{n2}|2n\rangle $$ which when substituted gives $$ \hat{H}|\phi\rangle = \sum_n \left[\frac{\hbar \omega}{2}c_{2n}+\hbar \omega (2n) c_{2n}+c_{2n-2}+c_{2n+2}\right]|2n\rangle $$ which gives the infinite system $$ c_{2n}= \left(\frac{\hbar \omega}{2}+2n\hbar \omega\right)c_{2n} +c_{2n-2}+c_{2n+2}. $$ I am not sure if this leads anywhere.

Question

Is there a standard way to approach this problem? Any help?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ This is a standard kind of problem in perturbation theory, where it is straightforward to get the second-order corrections to the energy. Getting the exact solution is much trickier. $\endgroup$
    – Buzz
    Commented Jun 7, 2022 at 12:24
  • $\begingroup$ $A$ is not small though, so in general I can't use perturbation theory I think. $\endgroup$
    – Andrea
    Commented Jun 7, 2022 at 12:31

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

The operators $\hat C=\hat a^\dagger \hat a + \hat a\hat a^\dagger$, $\hat A=\hat a^\dagger \hat a^\dagger$ and $\hat B=\hat a\hat a$ span an $\mathfrak{su}(1,1)$ Lie algebra.

The problem is solved using an $SU(1,1)$ transformation $T$ (in your case that's just a Bogoliubov transformation) that will map $\hat A$ to a linear combination of $\hat A,\hat B$ and $\hat C$. The same transformation will also map $\hat B$ and $\hat C$ to linear combinations of $\hat A,\hat B$ and $\hat C$. One then chooses the parameters in $T$ to eliminate the non-diagonal terms.

There's another equivalent approach which is to write your Hamiltonian in terms of $x$ and $p$. With some elementary insight you should see how this is actually the Hamiltonian of a harmonic oscillator with frequency $\omega^\prime$ which is a multiple of the original frequency $\omega$ of your problem. Once $\hat H$ is expressed in terms of $\omega^\prime$ you can just quantize that in terms of new raising operators $\hat b$ and $\hat b^\dagger$.

It shouldn't be too hard for you to find literature on Bogoliubov transformations, or $\mathfrak{su}(1,1)$ (or equivalently $\mathfrak{sp}(2,\mathbb{R})$).

In fact, the Wikipedia article on Bogoliubov transformations is not a bad place to start. You should be able to invert $$ \hat b=u\hat a+v\hat a^\dagger\, ,\qquad \hat b^\dagger=u^*\hat a^\dagger+v^*\hat a $$ and re-express your $H$ in terms of $\hat b$ and $\hat b^\dagger$, then choose $u$ and $v$ to eliminate the $\hat b\hat b$ and $\hat b^\dagger\hat b^\dagger$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.