Since the only plasmas where that bump-on-tail velocity distribution function (VDF) can exist are those that are either weakly collisional or collisionless, it is perfectly okay to add VDFs. That is, those plasmas are neither in thermodynamic or thermal equilibrium, so there is nothing wrong with adding two VDFs as they are not a single temperature (e.g., see https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/268594/59023 or https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/375611/59023).
The general bi-Maxwellian VDF of species $s$ is given by:
$$
f_{s}\left( v_{\parallel}, v_{\perp} \right) = \frac{ n_{s} }{ \pi^{3/2} \ V_{T \parallel, s} \ V_{T \perp, s}^{2} } \ exp\left[ - \left( \frac{ v_{\parallel} - v_{o, \parallel, s} }{ V_{T \parallel, s} } \right)^{2} - \left( \frac{ v_{\perp} - v_{o, \perp, s} }{ V_{T \perp, s} } \right)^{2} \right] \tag{0}
$$
where $\parallel$($\perp$) refer to directions parallel(perpendicular) with respect to a quasi-static magnetic field, $\mathbf{B}_{o}$, $V_{T_{j, s}}$ is the $j^{th}$ thermal speed (actually the most probable speed), $v_{o, j, s}$ is the $j^{th}$ component of the bulk drift velocity of the distribution (i.e., from the 1st velocity moment), and $n_{s}$ is the number density or zeroth velocity moment of species $s$.
Typically beams (i.e., the little bump in your merged VDF) are not isotropic, so it is common to have a VDF for the core and a VDF for the beam. It is okay to use a form like Equation 0 for both, each with different densities and thermal speeds. The non-equilibrium nature of the plasma allows two such VDFs to effectively stream past each other. They tend to excite instabilities that lead to fluctuations like Langmuir waves.
You could get a little fancier and use a bi-kappa VDF. The bi-kappa distribution function is given by:
$$
f_{s}\left( v_{\parallel}, v_{\perp} \right) = A_{s} \left[ 1 + \left( \frac{ v_{\parallel} - v_{o, \parallel, s} }{ \sqrt{ \kappa_{s} - 3/2 } \ \theta_{\parallel, s} } \right)^{2} + \left( \frac{ v_{\perp} - v_{o, \perp, s} }{ \sqrt{ \kappa - 3/2 } \ \theta_{\perp, s} } \right)^{2} \right]^{- \left( \kappa_{s} + 1 \right) } \tag{1}
$$
where the amplitude is given by:
$$
A_{s} = \left( \frac{ n_{s} \ \Gamma\left( \kappa_{s} + 1 \right) }{ \left( \pi \left( \kappa_{s} - 3/2 \right) \right)^{3/2} \ \theta_{\parallel, s} \ \theta_{\perp, s}^{2} \ \Gamma\left( \kappa_{s} - 1/2 \right) } \right) \tag{2}
$$
and where $\theta_{j, s}$ is the $j^{th}$ thermal speed (also the most probable speed), $\Gamma(x)$ is the complete gamma function, and $\kappa_{s}$ is the kappa index and can be any value larger than 3/2.
Further we can show that the average temperature is just given by:
$$
T = \frac{ 1 }{ 3 } \left( T_{\parallel} + 2 \ T_{\perp} \right) \tag{3}
$$
if we assume a gyrotropic distribution (i.e., shows symmetry about $\mathbf{B}_{o}$ so that the two perpendicular components of a diagonalized pressure tensor are equal).
.
Kindly correct me if I am wrong. 
