Timeline for Is the canonical momentum conserved when a particle moves in magnetic field?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2021 at 5:54 | answer | added | user41025 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 24, 2014 at 9:49 | answer | added | Sergio Lantzman | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 14, 2014 at 11:45 | vote | accept | qfzklm | ||
| Feb 14, 2014 at 11:38 | vote | accept | qfzklm | ||
| Feb 14, 2014 at 11:45 | |||||
| Feb 14, 2014 at 11:38 | vote | accept | qfzklm | ||
| Feb 14, 2014 at 11:38 | |||||
| Feb 14, 2014 at 11:37 | comment | added | qfzklm | @JánLalinský Thank you very much, and I have to apologize for my fault to everyone. | |
| Feb 11, 2014 at 6:09 | answer | added | Rococo | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 20:20 | answer | added | Urgje | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 16:20 | comment | added | Ján Lalinský | qfzklm, you've got it wrong. The Hamiltonian function for particle in magnetic field is $H(\vec p, \vec r) = \frac{(\vec p - q\vec A(\vec r))^2}{2m}$, and lower-case $\vec p$ is called canonical momentum, while upper-case $\vec P = \vec p - q\vec A$ is kinetic momentum ($m\vec v$). | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 15:38 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 11, 2014 at 9:49 | |||||
| Feb 10, 2014 at 15:19 | comment | added | Kyle Kanos | possible duplicate of A question about canonical momentum and arbitrariness for potential in magnetism | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 15:01 | answer | added | ZachMcDargh | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 14:56 | answer | added | jinawee | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 14:23 | comment | added | qfzklm | @CarlWitthoft $H=\frac{P^2}{2m}$ and $[P,H]=0$, I think $P$ is conserved. Btw, I do not have this book and my textbook do not discuss this or other similar questions, could you tell me more details? | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 14:04 | comment | added | Carl Witthoft | But why do you think that? -- not that your linked question has a very clear answer. I'd dig into L&L or similar textbooks for details rather than just re-asking the question. | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 14:01 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
| Feb 10, 2014 at 13:50 | history | asked | qfzklm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |