Timeline for Is there a way to decrease the rate of nuclear Beta decay?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2020 at 5:14 | history | edited | anna v | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added cached link
|
| Jan 11, 2020 at 5:09 | history | edited | anna v | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added cached link
|
| Jan 11, 2020 at 4:42 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | First link now dead. | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 4:59 | history | edited | anna v | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected broken link and added another
|
| Dec 9, 2016 at 4:59 | comment | added | anna v | @rob there seem to be other , more recent , models than the one you propose so "wrong" is not proven. | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 1:55 | comment | added | rob♦ | This answer is wrong: the Reifenschweiler effect was a change in the detector, not a change in the tritium. (One source.) | |
| Aug 14, 2011 at 20:13 | comment | added | user4552 | Looks like bogus science to me. | |
| May 28, 2011 at 14:25 | comment | added | anna v | Keenan and Lurscher I had not noticed the cold fusion use of the effect. I just searched for "Casimir" and "decay" because I vaguely remembered reading about this years ago.I have not been able to find more recent research on the subject. | |
| May 28, 2011 at 11:30 | comment | added | Eric | thanks a lot for this reference. Like other commentators, I wish there would be more work on this kind of effect. Perhaps modern modelization and theoretical tools could help find an interpretation for this. | |
| May 28, 2011 at 11:29 | vote | accept | Eric | ||
| May 13, 2011 at 16:35 | comment | added | lurscher | yeah i would like to know more about further validation experiments that have happened, i couldn't find many references on this effect | |
| May 13, 2011 at 6:02 | comment | added | Keenan Pepper | Is this reproducible? Is there a consensus among physicists that it exists? You'll forgive me for doubting that website... | |
| May 11, 2011 at 12:45 | history | answered | anna v | CC BY-SA 3.0 |