Timeline for What is the current physical theory of what causes the 'Morning Glory' roll cloud over Northern Australia?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 15, 2018 at 18:38 | comment | added | Nat | Have to say that I'm unsure about whether to tag this everyday-life. I mean, on the one hand, it's basically asking about something mostly observed by non-physicists in non-scientific settings, but it also feels strange to call it "everyday". | |
Jun 15, 2018 at 18:36 | history | edited | Nat | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 72 characters in body
|
Jan 31, 2014 at 16:38 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Jan 31, 2014 at 16:41 | |||||
S Jan 30, 2014 at 7:26 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Jan 30, 2014 at 7:26 | history | notice removed | user36538 | ||
Jan 30, 2014 at 7:26 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
Jan 25, 2014 at 4:47 | answer | added | Scott Griffiths | timeline score: 7 | |
Jan 23, 2014 at 22:11 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/426477322771116032 | ||
S Jan 23, 2014 at 19:58 | history | bounty started | CommunityBot | ||
S Jan 23, 2014 at 19:58 | history | notice added | user36538 | Draw attention | |
Jan 18, 2014 at 20:59 | comment | added | Kyle Kanos | This is true. It's also true that meteorology is not my field, I just read the wiki link and responded with my first thoughts. | |
Jan 18, 2014 at 20:53 | comment | added | user36538 | @KyleKanos well, it means that Wikipedia does not have a definitive theory reported, not necessarily that there is no new research. | |
Jan 18, 2014 at 14:50 | comment | added | Kyle Kanos | The first paragraph in the section following your cited line suggests at least one method by which these clouds can form. But given that the paragraphs following that one suggest that there are other methods by which it can form, it does not seem that there is a definitive theory. | |
Jan 18, 2014 at 10:30 | history | asked | user36538 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |