Skip to main content
Please don't introduce new tags unless necessary
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

Earnshaw's theoremEarnshaw's theorem states that the Laplacian of the potential energy of a small charge moving through a landscape full of static negative and/or positive charges (and gravity) is zero. Thus you can't have stable levitation (electrostatic or magnetostatic) because that would require a "bowl" in the potential energy field (levitation uses forces such as diamagnetism to circumvent the theorem and allow objects float).

What if the landscape charges are attached to springs and dampers so they move slightly when we move our charge? My intuition is that this would always create a negative (mountaintop) Laplacian. If there was a case which didn't it would be exploited for the magnetic levitation since diamagnetism is very weak. Consider an infinite sheet of plane charges. Without springs the force on our + point charge is constant. But with springs, the sheet will bulge away (if +) or toward (if -) our +. Both cases create a negative Laplacian. Is a negative Laplacian true for any spring configuration? If so, is there a simple way of proving it?

Earnshaw's theorem states that the Laplacian of the potential energy of a small charge moving through a landscape full of static negative and/or positive charges (and gravity) is zero. Thus you can't have stable levitation (electrostatic or magnetostatic) because that would require a "bowl" in the potential energy field (levitation uses forces such as diamagnetism to circumvent the theorem and allow objects float).

What if the landscape charges are attached to springs and dampers so they move slightly when we move our charge? My intuition is that this would always create a negative (mountaintop) Laplacian. If there was a case which didn't it would be exploited for the magnetic levitation since diamagnetism is very weak. Consider an infinite sheet of plane charges. Without springs the force on our + point charge is constant. But with springs, the sheet will bulge away (if +) or toward (if -) our +. Both cases create a negative Laplacian. Is a negative Laplacian true for any spring configuration? If so, is there a simple way of proving it?

Earnshaw's theorem states that the Laplacian of the potential energy of a small charge moving through a landscape full of static negative and/or positive charges (and gravity) is zero. Thus you can't have stable levitation (electrostatic or magnetostatic) because that would require a "bowl" in the potential energy field (levitation uses forces such as diamagnetism to circumvent the theorem and allow objects float).

What if the landscape charges are attached to springs and dampers so they move slightly when we move our charge? My intuition is that this would always create a negative (mountaintop) Laplacian. If there was a case which didn't it would be exploited for the magnetic levitation since diamagnetism is very weak. Consider an infinite sheet of plane charges. Without springs the force on our + point charge is constant. But with springs, the sheet will bulge away (if +) or toward (if -) our +. Both cases create a negative Laplacian. Is a negative Laplacian true for any spring configuration? If so, is there a simple way of proving it?

Source Link
Kevin Kostlan
  • 6.7k
  • 1
  • 25
  • 36

Earnshaw's theorem and springs

Earnshaw's theorem states that the Laplacian of the potential energy of a small charge moving through a landscape full of static negative and/or positive charges (and gravity) is zero. Thus you can't have stable levitation (electrostatic or magnetostatic) because that would require a "bowl" in the potential energy field (levitation uses forces such as diamagnetism to circumvent the theorem and allow objects float).

What if the landscape charges are attached to springs and dampers so they move slightly when we move our charge? My intuition is that this would always create a negative (mountaintop) Laplacian. If there was a case which didn't it would be exploited for the magnetic levitation since diamagnetism is very weak. Consider an infinite sheet of plane charges. Without springs the force on our + point charge is constant. But with springs, the sheet will bulge away (if +) or toward (if -) our +. Both cases create a negative Laplacian. Is a negative Laplacian true for any spring configuration? If so, is there a simple way of proving it?