Timeline for Lorentzian and Einstein Manifold
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2014 at 20:50 | comment | added | MBN | I would recommend this book amazon.com/…. | |
| Jan 7, 2014 at 20:45 | answer | added | cesaruliana | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 6, 2014 at 0:40 | vote | accept | Temitope.A | ||
| Jan 3, 2014 at 19:16 | answer | added | Valter Moretti | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 3, 2014 at 18:49 | comment | added | Zo the Relativist | Honestly, when my real goal is learning physics, I have found a much richer time to go and just try and learn the relevant physics first, pick up a list of the math I don't know, and then go back and try to understand the math, and come back and look at the physics again. You'll be chasing your tail forever if you try to understand all of the math upfront. | |
| Jan 3, 2014 at 18:25 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 102 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Jan 3, 2014 at 17:47 | comment | added | Alex Nelson | You might want to read Arthur Besse's Einstein Manifolds, arXiv:math/0603190, Narayanan's "Singularity Theorems". For a more physicist's orientation, perhaps Poisson's Relativist's Toolkit, Bojowalds Applications of Canonical Gravity, or Bruhat's Einstein's Equations should be perused. | |
| Jan 3, 2014 at 17:13 | history | asked | Temitope.A | CC BY-SA 3.0 |