Timeline for Superconductivity: why can't the resistance reach 0?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2014 at 3:57 | history | edited | Brandon Enright | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Feb 6, 2014 at 19:18 | answer | added | Uncle Al | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 6, 2014 at 17:45 | history | edited | Brandon Enright | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 242 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Feb 6, 2014 at 17:38 | answer | added | Dominique Geffroy | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 3, 2014 at 12:57 | comment | added | Fahadalkadhi95 | One of the books here even say that newton laws are not true because they don't apply to large objects like planets...and i know what they mean but that's not the way to say it! | |
| Jan 3, 2014 at 12:52 | comment | added | Fahadalkadhi95 | It is the book that is being taught in high school around here and its out dated and misleading thats why i am asking to right the wrong | |
| Jan 3, 2014 at 12:50 | comment | added | Carl Witthoft | Please let us know what book this is so we can avoid it! Even pure conductors have nonlinear R vs. T curves, and very few materials are capable of achieving superconductivity regardless of temperature. | |
| Jan 3, 2014 at 12:17 | history | edited | Fahadalkadhi95 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 319 characters in body
|
| Jan 3, 2014 at 12:10 | history | asked | Fahadalkadhi95 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |