Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 19, 2020 at 23:48 comment added PM 2Ring Saying that the scale was small doesn't necessarily imply that the spatial dimensions themselves of the whole universe were small. IMHO, that sentence from Wikipedia would be better if it used the term "scale factor". On a related note, see physics.stackexchange.com/a/136861/123208
Oct 19, 2020 at 4:51 history edited Qmechanic
edited tags
Oct 19, 2020 at 0:51 answer added Buzz timeline score: 3
Dec 20, 2013 at 14:03 history edited Anixx CC BY-SA 3.0
added 37 characters in body
Dec 20, 2013 at 14:01 comment added Kyle Kanos The (visible) universe is currently approximately $10^{27}$ m in diameter. From supernova surveys, we know that the universe is accelerating its expansion. Extrapolate backwards for about 13.8 billion years and you get a diameter that is infinitesimal.
Dec 20, 2013 at 13:58 comment added Qmechanic Comment to the question (v1): It seems that OP is essentially pondering if the volume of 3-dimensional space is infinite or finite. Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/9419/2451 and links therein.
Dec 20, 2013 at 13:39 history asked Anixx CC BY-SA 3.0