Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/409628837312753664
edited tags
Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k
texify math
Source Link
David Z
  • 77.3k
  • 27
  • 186
  • 293

I was looking through an old copy of Barron's AP Physics and found this problem relating to impulse which I was initially confused about how to integrate.

enter image description here

Example 6.1 During a collision with a wall lasting from $t=0$ to $t=2\text{ s}$, the force acting on a $2\text{-kg}$ object is given by the equation $\mathbf{F} = (4\mathrm{\ kg\ m/s^4})t(2s-t)\hat{i}$

They work out that the integral is equal to:

enter image description here$$\frac{16}{3}\hat{i}\frac{\text{kg m}}{\text{s}}$$

I am confused about the role of the units in the problem.

Looking at the answer, it seems that if I were to just ignore all the units and simply integrate $4t\cdot(2-t)$ that would give me $16/3$, and because that is a force I know it to be $\mathrm{kgm/s}$$\mathrm{kg\,m/s}$ or $\mathrm{N}$.

Why it would be OK to ignore the units in the integral though is somewhat unintuitive to me (other than that I know the end result must be a force) and I feel like it may get me into trouble with other problems.

Can someone explain how it is that the scalar values of the original unit quantities still give you the correct answer?

And also, what exactly is a kilogram metre per second ^ 4? Is there any way to easily perceive what that is?

I was looking through an old copy of Barron's AP Physics and found this problem relating to impulse which I was initially confused about how to integrate.

enter image description here

They work out that the integral is equal to:

enter image description here

I am confused about the role of the units in the problem.

Looking at the answer, it seems that if I were to just ignore all the units and simply integrate $4t\cdot(2-t)$ that would give me $16/3$, and because that is a force I know it to be $\mathrm{kgm/s}$ or $\mathrm{N}$.

Why it would be OK to ignore the units in the integral though is somewhat unintuitive to me (other than that I know the end result must be a force) and I feel like it may get me into trouble with other problems.

Can someone explain how it is that the scalar values of the original unit quantities still give you the correct answer?

And also, what exactly is a kilogram metre per second ^ 4? Is there any way to easily perceive what that is?

I was looking through an old copy of Barron's AP Physics and found this problem relating to impulse which I was initially confused about how to integrate.

Example 6.1 During a collision with a wall lasting from $t=0$ to $t=2\text{ s}$, the force acting on a $2\text{-kg}$ object is given by the equation $\mathbf{F} = (4\mathrm{\ kg\ m/s^4})t(2s-t)\hat{i}$

They work out that the integral is equal to:

$$\frac{16}{3}\hat{i}\frac{\text{kg m}}{\text{s}}$$

I am confused about the role of the units in the problem.

Looking at the answer, it seems that if I were to just ignore all the units and simply integrate $4t\cdot(2-t)$ that would give me $16/3$, and because that is a force I know it to be $\mathrm{kg\,m/s}$ or $\mathrm{N}$.

Why it would be OK to ignore the units in the integral though is somewhat unintuitive to me (other than that I know the end result must be a force) and I feel like it may get me into trouble with other problems.

Can someone explain how it is that the scalar values of the original unit quantities still give you the correct answer?

added 28 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Brandon Enright
  • 12k
  • 17
  • 52
  • 78

I was looking through an old copy of Barron's AP Physics and found this problem relating to impulse which I was initially confused about how to integrate.

![enter image description here][1] [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/22loG.pngenter image description here

They work out that the integral is equal to:

enter image description here

I am confused about the role of the units in the problem.

Looking at the answer, it seems that if I were to just ignore all the units and simply integrate 4t*(2-t)$4t\cdot(2-t)$ that would give me 16/3$16/3$, and because that is a force I know it to be kgm/s$\mathrm{kgm/s}$ or N$\mathrm{N}$.

Why it would be OK to ignore the units in the integral though is somewhat unintuitive to me (other than that I know the end result must be a force) and I feel like it may get me into trouble with other problems.

Can someone explain how it is that the scalar values of the original unit quantities still give you the correct answer?

And also, what exactly is a kilogram metre per second ^ 4kilogram metre per second ^ 4? Is there any way to easily perceive what that is?

I was looking through an old copy of Barron's AP Physics and found this problem relating to impulse which I was initially confused about how to integrate.

![enter image description here][1] [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/22loG.png

They work out that the integral is equal to:

enter image description here

I am confused about the role of the units in the problem.

Looking at the answer, it seems that if I were to just ignore all the units and simply integrate 4t*(2-t) that would give me 16/3, and because that is a force I know it to be kgm/s or N.

Why it would be OK to ignore the units in the integral though is somewhat unintuitive to me (other than that I know the end result must be a force) and I feel like it may get me into trouble with other problems.

Can someone explain how it is that the scalar values of the original unit quantities still give you the correct answer?

And also, what exactly is a kilogram metre per second ^ 4? Is there any way to easily perceive what that is?

I was looking through an old copy of Barron's AP Physics and found this problem relating to impulse which I was initially confused about how to integrate.

enter image description here

They work out that the integral is equal to:

enter image description here

I am confused about the role of the units in the problem.

Looking at the answer, it seems that if I were to just ignore all the units and simply integrate $4t\cdot(2-t)$ that would give me $16/3$, and because that is a force I know it to be $\mathrm{kgm/s}$ or $\mathrm{N}$.

Why it would be OK to ignore the units in the integral though is somewhat unintuitive to me (other than that I know the end result must be a force) and I feel like it may get me into trouble with other problems.

Can someone explain how it is that the scalar values of the original unit quantities still give you the correct answer?

And also, what exactly is a kilogram metre per second ^ 4? Is there any way to easily perceive what that is?

Source Link
user2813684
  • 71
  • 1
  • 1
  • 2
Loading