Timeline for What is the area in Faraday's law if we have only a piece of metal moving in a magnetic field?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 21, 2016 at 8:57 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Aug 20, 2016 at 6:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 19, 2016 at 17:57 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jun 11, 2016 at 5:06 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
May 11, 2016 at 21:14 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 24, 2014 at 11:09 | comment | added | Paul | Related.physics.stackexchange.com/questions/146628/faradays-paradox | |
Oct 27, 2014 at 22:57 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/526870248381620225 | ||
Mar 17, 2014 at 14:42 | comment | added | Steve Byrnes | You're describing a "homopolar generator". There is a discussion of how Faraday's law does (not) apply to homopolar generators at: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… | |
S Mar 17, 2014 at 6:15 | history | edited | BMS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization, brevity. Minor LaTeX.
|
S Mar 17, 2014 at 6:15 | history | suggested | Nick Stauner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization, brevity
|
Mar 17, 2014 at 5:51 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Mar 17, 2014 at 6:15 | |||||
Jan 16, 2014 at 3:36 | answer | added | Ján Lalinský | timeline score: 1 | |
Jan 16, 2014 at 3:27 | comment | added | Ján Lalinský | Minor point: the potential difference (integral of electric field) is not the same thing as emf; in a piece of metal, electromotive force is actually opposite to electric field. They have the same absolute values if the electric current does not flow, but they have opposite signs (the corresponding intensities cancel each other). | |
Dec 6, 2013 at 23:11 | answer | added | Eddy | timeline score: -1 | |
Dec 6, 2013 at 21:45 | history | edited | Revo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Dec 6, 2013 at 21:44 | history | edited | Brandon Enright | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 15 characters in body
|
Dec 6, 2013 at 21:41 | history | asked | Revo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |