Return to Question

According to Peskin & Schroeder (page 325), the Feynman rule for the counterterm

 ------(x)----- 

for

$$ \frac12 \delta_Z(\partial_\mu\phi_r)^2-\frac12\delta_m \phi^2$$

is given by

$$i(p^2\delta_Z-\delta_m)$$

which resembles rather the (multiplicative) inverse of the propagator for the original Lagrangian (whith physical quantities). Why?

According to Peskin & Schroeder (page 325), the Feynman rule for the counterterm

 ------(x)----- 

for

$$ \frac12 \delta_Z(\partial_\mu\phi_r)^2-\frac12\delta_m \phi_r^2$$

being $\phi_r$ the renormalized field, is given by

$$i(p^2\delta_Z-\delta_m)$$

which resembles rather the (multiplicative) inverse of the propagator for the original Lagrangian (whith physical quantities). Why?

According to Peskin & Schroeder (page 325), the Feynman rule for the counterterm

 ------(x)----- 

for

$$ \frac12 \delta_Z(\partial_\mu\phi_r)^2-\frac12\delta_\mu \phi^2$$

is given by

$$i(p^2\delta_Z-\delta_m)$$

which resembles rather the (multiplicative) inverse of the propagator for the original Lagrangian (whith physical quantities). Why?

According to Peskin & Schroeder (page 325), the Feynman rule for the counterterm

 ------(x)----- 

for

$$ \frac12 \delta_Z(\partial_\mu\phi_r)^2-\frac12\delta_m \phi^2$$

is given by

$$i(p^2\delta_Z-\delta_m)$$

which resembles rather the (multiplicative) inverse of the propagator for the original Lagrangian (whith physical quantities). Why?

According to Peskin & Schroeder, the Feynman rule for the counterterm

 ------(x)----- 

for

$$ \frac12 \delta_Z(\partial_\mu\phi_r)^2-\frac12\delta_\mu \phi^2$$

is given by

$$i(p^2\delta_Z-\delta_m)$$

which resembles rather the (multiplicative) inverse of the propagator for the original Lagrangian (whith physical quantities). Why?

According to Peskin & Schroeder (page 325), the Feynman rule for the counterterm

 ------(x)----- 

for

$$ \frac12 \delta_Z(\partial_\mu\phi_r)^2-\frac12\delta_\mu \phi^2$$

is given by

$$i(p^2\delta_Z-\delta_m)$$

which resembles rather the (multiplicative) inverse of the propagator for the original Lagrangian (whith physical quantities). Why?