Skip to main content
EditQuestion
Source Link

I am trying to calculate the entropy for a classical two dimensional free gas of 𝑁 particles in a box of side 𝐿 and total energy 𝐸. Using two methods, I obtain different scaling factors inside the logarithm of the number of microstates:

Microcanonical Method (Direct Counting):
Here, I compute the phase space volume directly with the energy constraint 𝐸. The number of microstates is given by: $$ \Omega=\frac{1}{N!}\left(\frac{1}{h^2}L^2\int_{0}^{\infty}d^2p\right)^N=\frac{1}{N!}(L^2E)^N .$$ Here I kept $\frac{2\pi m}{h^2}=1$. To get the entropy, we use Boltzman Law followed by Stirling approximation and get $$S=K\ln\left(\frac{1}{N!} (L^2 E)^N\right)=Nk\ln\left(L^2E\right)-Nk\ln N +Nk\tag{1}$$

Canonical Partition Function Method:
Here, I calculate the partition function at a fixed temperature 𝑇 as $$ Z=\frac{1}{N!}\left(\frac{2\pi m kT}{h^2}\right)^N$$ where T is related to the energy 𝐸 via $𝑇=\frac{𝐸}{𝑁k}$. Substituting this into the partition function yields$$Z=\frac{1}{N!}\left[\frac{L^2 E}{N}\right]^N$$ In short taking negative KT times natural log and then differentiating with respect to temperature with a minus sign we get entropy $$S =Nk\ln\left(\frac{L^2E}{N}\right)-Nk\ln N +Nk\tag{2}$$ From (1) and (2), we can see there is a difference in the solutions. Latter contains $\frac{1}{N}$, and the former doesn't contain. Can you help to me understand why there is a difference and which one is more precise?

I am trying to calculate the entropy for a classical two dimensional free gas of 𝑁 particles in a box of side 𝐿 and total energy 𝐸. Using two methods, I obtain different scaling factors inside the logarithm of the number of microstates:

Microcanonical Method (Direct Counting):
Here, I compute the phase space volume directly with the energy constraint 𝐸. The number of microstates is given by: $$ \Omega=\frac{1}{N!}\left(\frac{1}{h^2}L^2\int_{0}^{\infty}d^2p\right)^N=\frac{1}{N!}(L^2E)^N .$$ Here I kept $\frac{2\pi m}{h^2}=1$. To get the entropy we use Boltzman Law followed by Stirling approximation and get $$S=K\ln\left(\frac{1}{N!} (L^2 E)^N\right)=Nk\ln\left(L^2E\right)-Nk\ln N +Nk\tag{1}$$

Canonical Partition Function Method:
Here, I calculate the partition function at a fixed temperature 𝑇 as $$ Z=\frac{1}{N!}\left(\frac{2\pi m kT}{h^2}\right)^N$$ where T is related to the energy 𝐸 via $𝑇=\frac{𝐸}{𝑁k}$. Substituting this into the partition function yields$$Z=\frac{1}{N!}\left[\frac{L^2 E}{N}\right]^N$$ In short taking negative KT times natural log and then differentiating with respect to temperature with a minus sign we get entropy $$S =Nk\ln\left(\frac{L^2E}{N}\right)-Nk\ln N +Nk\tag{2}$$ From (1) and (2) we can see there is a difference in the solutions. Latter contains $\frac{1}{N}$ and the former doesn't contain. Can you help to me understand why there is a difference and which one is more precise?

I am trying to calculate the entropy for a classical two dimensional free gas of 𝑁 particles in a box of side 𝐿 and total energy 𝐸. Using two methods, I obtain different scaling factors inside the logarithm of the number of microstates:

Microcanonical Method (Direct Counting):
Here, I compute the phase space volume directly with the energy constraint 𝐸. The number of microstates is given by: $$ \Omega=\frac{1}{N!}\left(\frac{1}{h^2}L^2\int_{0}^{\infty}d^2p\right)^N=\frac{1}{N!}(L^2E)^N .$$ Here I kept $\frac{2\pi m}{h^2}=1$. To get the entropy, we use Boltzman Law followed by Stirling approximation and get $$S=K\ln\left(\frac{1}{N!} (L^2 E)^N\right)=Nk\ln\left(L^2E\right)-Nk\ln N +Nk\tag{1}$$

Canonical Partition Function Method:
Here, I calculate the partition function at a fixed temperature 𝑇 as $$ Z=\frac{1}{N!}\left(\frac{2\pi m kT}{h^2}\right)^N$$ where T is related to the energy 𝐸 via $𝑇=\frac{𝐸}{𝑁k}$. Substituting this into the partition function yields$$Z=\frac{1}{N!}\left[\frac{L^2 E}{N}\right]^N$$ In short taking negative KT times natural log and then differentiating with respect to temperature with a minus sign we get entropy $$S =Nk\ln\left(\frac{L^2E}{N}\right)-Nk\ln N +Nk\tag{2}$$ From (1) and (2), we can see there is a difference in the solutions. Latter contains $\frac{1}{N}$, and the former doesn't contain. Can you help me understand why there is a difference and which one is more precise?

edited title
Link

Title: Why does the partition function method introduce a $\frac{1} {𝑁 }$ term while calculating entropy for a classical gas?

added 33 characters in body
Source Link
Roger V.
  • 65k
  • 7
  • 69
  • 215

I am trying to calculate the entropy for a classical two dimensional free gas of 𝑁 particles in a box of side 𝐿 and total energy 𝐸.Using Using two methods, I obtain different scaling factors inside the logarithm of the number of microstates: Microcanonical Method (Direct Counting)

Microcanonical Method (Direct Counting): 
Here, I compute the phase space volume directly with the energy constraint 𝐸.The The number of microstates is given by: $$ \Omega=\frac{1}{N!}(\frac{1}{h^2}L^2\int_{0}^{\infty}d^2p)^N=\frac{1}{N!}(L^2E)^N $$.$$ \Omega=\frac{1}{N!}\left(\frac{1}{h^2}L^2\int_{0}^{\infty}d^2p\right)^N=\frac{1}{N!}(L^2E)^N .$$ Here iI kept $\frac{2\pi m}{h^2}=1$.To To get the entropy we use Boltzman Law followed by stirlingStirling approximation and get $$S=K\ln\left(\frac{1}{N!} (L^2 E)^N\right)=Nk\ln\left(L^2E\right)-Nk\ln N +Nk\tag{1}$$ Canonical Partition Function Method:

Canonical Partition Function Method:
Here, I calculate the partition function at a fixed temperature 𝑇 as $$ Z=\frac{1}{N!}\left(\frac{2\pi m kT}{h^2}\right)^N$$ where T is related to the energy 𝐸 via $𝑇=\frac{𝐸}{𝑁k}$.Substituting Substituting this into the partition function yields$$Z=\frac{1}{N!}\left[\frac{L^2 E}{N}\right]^N$$ In short taking negative KT times natural log and then differentiating with respect to temperature with a minus sign we get entropy $$S =Nk\ln\left(\frac{L^2E}{N}\right)-Nk\ln N +Nk\tag{2}$$ From (1) and (2) we can see there is a difference in the solutions.Latter Latter contains $\frac{1}{N}$ and the former doesnotdoesn't contain.Can u Can you help to me understand why there is a difference and which one is more precise?

I am trying to calculate the entropy for a classical two dimensional free gas of 𝑁 particles in a box of side 𝐿 and total energy 𝐸.Using two methods, I obtain different scaling factors inside the logarithm of the number of microstates: Microcanonical Method (Direct Counting): Here, I compute the phase space volume directly with the energy constraint 𝐸.The number of microstates is given by: $$ \Omega=\frac{1}{N!}(\frac{1}{h^2}L^2\int_{0}^{\infty}d^2p)^N=\frac{1}{N!}(L^2E)^N $$.Here i kept $\frac{2\pi m}{h^2}=1$.To get the entropy we use Boltzman Law followed by stirling approximation and get $$S=K\ln\left(\frac{1}{N!} (L^2 E)^N\right)=Nk\ln\left(L^2E\right)-Nk\ln N +Nk\tag{1}$$ Canonical Partition Function Method: Here, I calculate the partition function at a fixed temperature 𝑇 as $$ Z=\frac{1}{N!}\left(\frac{2\pi m kT}{h^2}\right)^N$$ where T is related to the energy 𝐸 via $𝑇=\frac{𝐸}{𝑁k}$.Substituting this into the partition function yields$$Z=\frac{1}{N!}\left[\frac{L^2 E}{N}\right]^N$$ In short taking negative KT times natural log and then differentiating with respect to temperature with a minus sign we get entropy $$S =Nk\ln\left(\frac{L^2E}{N}\right)-Nk\ln N +Nk\tag{2}$$ From (1) and (2) we can see there is a difference in the solutions.Latter contains $\frac{1}{N}$ and the former doesnot contain.Can u help to me understand why there is a difference and which one is more precise?

I am trying to calculate the entropy for a classical two dimensional free gas of 𝑁 particles in a box of side 𝐿 and total energy 𝐸. Using two methods, I obtain different scaling factors inside the logarithm of the number of microstates:

Microcanonical Method (Direct Counting): 
Here, I compute the phase space volume directly with the energy constraint 𝐸. The number of microstates is given by: $$ \Omega=\frac{1}{N!}\left(\frac{1}{h^2}L^2\int_{0}^{\infty}d^2p\right)^N=\frac{1}{N!}(L^2E)^N .$$ Here I kept $\frac{2\pi m}{h^2}=1$. To get the entropy we use Boltzman Law followed by Stirling approximation and get $$S=K\ln\left(\frac{1}{N!} (L^2 E)^N\right)=Nk\ln\left(L^2E\right)-Nk\ln N +Nk\tag{1}$$

Canonical Partition Function Method:
Here, I calculate the partition function at a fixed temperature 𝑇 as $$ Z=\frac{1}{N!}\left(\frac{2\pi m kT}{h^2}\right)^N$$ where T is related to the energy 𝐸 via $𝑇=\frac{𝐸}{𝑁k}$. Substituting this into the partition function yields$$Z=\frac{1}{N!}\left[\frac{L^2 E}{N}\right]^N$$ In short taking negative KT times natural log and then differentiating with respect to temperature with a minus sign we get entropy $$S =Nk\ln\left(\frac{L^2E}{N}\right)-Nk\ln N +Nk\tag{2}$$ From (1) and (2) we can see there is a difference in the solutions. Latter contains $\frac{1}{N}$ and the former doesn't contain. Can you help to me understand why there is a difference and which one is more precise?

deleted 3 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading