Timeline for Why aren't we bumping into objects outside of the visible range?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
29 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Dec 10 at 10:13 | history | suggested | JRE | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed random capitalization. https://writer.com/blog/capitalization-rules/
|
Dec 10 at 8:19 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Dec 10 at 10:13 | |||||
Dec 10 at 0:47 | answer | added | Acccumulation | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 9 at 15:56 | comment | added | JimmyJames | arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/03/… | |
Dec 9 at 15:16 | comment | added | CGCampbell | I would ask it slightly different... would it be possible for an 'object' to be completely transparent to our visible spectrum, and reflective to UV or IR or even higher/lower? | |
Dec 9 at 13:07 | answer | added | Matt Hanson | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 9 at 12:52 | history | edited | Matt Hanson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 86 characters in body
|
Dec 9 at 10:48 | comment | added | civitas | First approach to this question: Turn the lights off (safety tip clear floor ways of Lego and similar impediments). | |
Dec 9 at 10:13 | answer | added | Okarin | timeline score: 5 | |
Dec 9 at 7:22 | comment | converted from answer | Professor Sushing | We do bump into things that do not reflect or emit visible light. Why do you think people carry torches in the dark? | |
Dec 9 at 5:29 | comment | added | Glenn Willen | @fraxinus I once left a faceprint on a clear glass floor to ceiling window, right next to a doorway. Walked directly into it, full speed ahead. Fortunately I wasn't injured! I was very startled. | |
Dec 9 at 4:44 | answer | added | Mark Foskey | timeline score: 20 | |
Dec 8 at 19:44 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags
|
Dec 8 at 18:20 | comment | added | Dan Getz | The wavelength describes what a photon looks like, but not what an object looks like; viewing an object is more complicated than a single number. | |
Dec 8 at 15:05 | comment | added | Aaargh Zombies | Just to be clear, it this question predicated on the existence of physical objects with sufficient density for the to interact with humans (EG, a solid, not a gas), which exist outside of the visible human spectrum? For example, that there are invisible rocks, tress or life forms of some variety? | |
Dec 8 at 14:32 | comment | added | MisterMiyagi | What exactly are you asking? Are you asking how humans avoid transparent objects, say glass? Are you asking why there aren’t many bump'able objects outside the visible range? Are you asking why most objects aren’t transparent even though we only see a limited spectrum? | |
Dec 8 at 13:41 | answer | added | fraxinus | timeline score: 13 | |
Dec 8 at 13:21 | comment | added | fraxinus | @hft even humans do sometimes. | |
Dec 8 at 12:22 | answer | added | Vilx- | timeline score: 34 | |
Dec 8 at 7:58 | answer | added | Barmar | timeline score: 11 | |
Dec 8 at 3:31 | history | became hot network question | |||
Dec 7 at 22:13 | answer | added | gandalf61 | timeline score: 46 | |
Dec 7 at 21:43 | comment | added | Filip Milovanović | A related interesting thing is that objects that we can see can have features that are invisible to us, but are revealed by cameras/sensors that can record frequencies outside of the visible range (like ultraviolet (UV) or infrared (IR), and beyond). Some examples are layering in some sedimentary rocks that otherwise look uniform (no visible layers), coloration of some flowers that look plain to us but appear vibrant/multicolored to insects, heat "glowing" from the human body in infrared, different surface layers of the Sun revealed by observing it in various frequencies, etc. | |
Dec 7 at 20:05 | comment | added | hft | You never seen a cat smash its face into a sliding glass door? | |
Dec 7 at 20:03 | answer | added | Ruffolo | timeline score: 18 | |
Dec 7 at 19:39 | answer | added | mmesser314 | timeline score: 75 | |
Dec 7 at 19:33 | comment | added | Jon Custer | Because basically everything around you interacts with visible light so you can see it. Thank you evolution! | |
S Dec 7 at 19:31 | review | First questions | |||
Dec 7 at 20:10 | |||||
S Dec 7 at 19:31 | history | asked | gary | CC BY-SA 4.0 |