Skip to main content
4 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 5 at 18:17 comment added Rani Sharoni Sure I will check the references. Thanks
Dec 5 at 14:44 comment added DrChinese The experiment is real, has been confirmed/replicated many times, perfectly matches theory… including the work by Peres and others. So there’s really nothing to debunk. There are QM interpretations that do not feature nonlocality or retrocausality, and certainly that is an option of each person. Of course, if you reject one thing you are stuck with some other kind of baggage, since local realism is not viable. A video is no substitute for peer reviewed works that are well regarded long after publication. I strongly suggest you read the cited paper and understand it fully before dismissing it.
Dec 5 at 6:34 comment added Rani Sharoni Do you meaning that the delayed-choice version shown backward in time causality? I think that it was shown to be the wrong interpretation and can be explained using ordered non-local cause and effect. The Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser, Debunked youtu.be/RQv5CVELG3U
Dec 5 at 2:51 history answered DrChinese CC BY-SA 4.0