Skip to main content
Became Hot Network Question
deleted 41 characters in body
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

I am very new to this business about entropy, so I came up with the following experiment to make sense of what I understood.

A gas in some volume $V$ initially expands into a gas in volume $2V$. We say there is entropy increment of $(k_B)N\log2$ in this process. On the other hand, if I know the resulting gas in volume $2V$, I can time reverse so that I know the initial configuration and vice versa. This is the main idea of information conservation, I think, as stated in herehere

This seems to suggest that Entropy of gas which we know have expanded from volume $V$ is same as entropy of gas in volume $V$ since they are in bijection. Because of the entropy increment above, then can we conclude that there are certain configurations of gas inside the volume $2V$ which have not and will not end up completely in the volume $V$, cuz otherwise both systems would have same entropy (i.e not differ by $N\log2$ amount entropy)?

That would explain the statement "why doesn't a gas system doesn't just shrink to a configuration in much smaller volume usually". Is that correct interpretation?

I am very new to this business about entropy, so I came up with the following experiment to make sense of what I understood.

A gas in some volume $V$ initially expands into a gas in volume $2V$. We say there is entropy increment of $(k_B)N\log2$ in this process. On the other hand, if I know the resulting gas in volume $2V$, I can time reverse so that I know the initial configuration and vice versa. This is the main idea of information conservation, I think, as stated in here

This seems to suggest that Entropy of gas which we know have expanded from volume $V$ is same as entropy of gas in volume $V$ since they are in bijection. Because of the entropy increment above, then can we conclude that there are certain configurations of gas inside the volume $2V$ which have not and will not end up completely in the volume $V$, cuz otherwise both systems would have same entropy (i.e not differ by $N\log2$ amount entropy)?

That would explain the statement "why doesn't a gas system doesn't just shrink to a configuration in much smaller volume usually". Is that correct interpretation?

I am very new to this business about entropy, so I came up with the following experiment to make sense of what I understood.

A gas in some volume $V$ initially expands into a gas in volume $2V$. We say there is entropy increment of $(k_B)N\log2$ in this process. On the other hand, if I know the resulting gas in volume $2V$, I can time reverse so that I know the initial configuration and vice versa. This is the main idea of information conservation, I think, as stated in here

This seems to suggest that Entropy of gas which we know have expanded from volume $V$ is same as entropy of gas in volume $V$ since they are in bijection. Because of the entropy increment above, then can we conclude that there are certain configurations of gas inside the volume $2V$ which have not and will not end up completely in the volume $V$, cuz otherwise both systems would have same entropy (i.e not differ by $N\log2$ amount entropy)?

That would explain the statement "why doesn't a gas system doesn't just shrink to a configuration in much smaller volume usually". Is that correct interpretation?

added 36 characters in body; edited title
Source Link

An implication of entropy increase due to free expansion Why doesn't gas usually contract in volume?

I am very new to this business about entropy, so I came up with the following experiment to make sense of what I understood.

A gas in some volume $V$ initially expands into a gas in volume $2V$. We say there is entropy increment of $(k_B)N\log2$ in this process. On the other hand, if I know the resulting gas in volume $2V$, I can time reverse so that I know the initial configuration and vice versa. This is the main idea of information conservation, I think, as stated in here

This seems to suggest that Entropy of gas which we know have expanded from volume $V$ is same as entropy of gas in volume $V$ since they are in bijection. Because of the entropy increment above, then can we conclude that there are certain configurations of gas inside the volume $2V$ which have not and will not end up completely in the volume $V$, cuz otherwise both systems would have same entropy (i.e not differ by $N\log2$ amount entropy)?

That would makeexplain the statements aboutstatement "why doesn't a gas system doesn't just shrink to its originala configuration (sometimes)"in much smaller volume usually". Is that correct interpretation?

An implication of entropy increase due to free expansion

I am very new to this business about entropy, so I came up with the following experiment to make sense of what I understood.

A gas in some volume $V$ initially expands into a gas in volume $2V$. We say there is entropy increment of $(k_B)N\log2$ in this process. On the other hand, if I know the resulting gas in volume $2V$, I can time reverse so that I know the initial configuration and vice versa. This is the main idea of information conservation, I think, as stated in here

This seems to suggest that Entropy of gas which we know have expanded from volume $V$ is same as entropy of gas in volume $V$ since they are in bijection. Because of the entropy increment above, then can we conclude that there are certain configurations of gas inside the volume $2V$ which have not and will not end up completely in the volume $V$, cuz otherwise both systems would have same entropy (i.e not differ by $N\log2$ amount entropy)?

That would make the statements about "why doesn't a gas system doesn't just shrink to its original configuration (sometimes)"

Why doesn't gas usually contract in volume?

I am very new to this business about entropy, so I came up with the following experiment to make sense of what I understood.

A gas in some volume $V$ initially expands into a gas in volume $2V$. We say there is entropy increment of $(k_B)N\log2$ in this process. On the other hand, if I know the resulting gas in volume $2V$, I can time reverse so that I know the initial configuration and vice versa. This is the main idea of information conservation, I think, as stated in here

This seems to suggest that Entropy of gas which we know have expanded from volume $V$ is same as entropy of gas in volume $V$ since they are in bijection. Because of the entropy increment above, then can we conclude that there are certain configurations of gas inside the volume $2V$ which have not and will not end up completely in the volume $V$, cuz otherwise both systems would have same entropy (i.e not differ by $N\log2$ amount entropy)?

That would explain the statement "why doesn't a gas system doesn't just shrink to a configuration in much smaller volume usually". Is that correct interpretation?

Source Link

An implication of entropy increase due to free expansion

I am very new to this business about entropy, so I came up with the following experiment to make sense of what I understood.

A gas in some volume $V$ initially expands into a gas in volume $2V$. We say there is entropy increment of $(k_B)N\log2$ in this process. On the other hand, if I know the resulting gas in volume $2V$, I can time reverse so that I know the initial configuration and vice versa. This is the main idea of information conservation, I think, as stated in here

This seems to suggest that Entropy of gas which we know have expanded from volume $V$ is same as entropy of gas in volume $V$ since they are in bijection. Because of the entropy increment above, then can we conclude that there are certain configurations of gas inside the volume $2V$ which have not and will not end up completely in the volume $V$, cuz otherwise both systems would have same entropy (i.e not differ by $N\log2$ amount entropy)?

That would make the statements about "why doesn't a gas system doesn't just shrink to its original configuration (sometimes)"