Timeline for Taking advantage of spin squeezing
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13 at 13:57 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 13 at 18:36 | |||||
| Nov 12 at 1:29 | answer | added | ZeroTheHero | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 11 at 20:21 | history | reopened |
Alex Marshall John Rennie knzhou |
||
| Nov 11 at 19:42 | history | edited | Alex Marshall | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 61 characters in body
|
| Nov 11 at 19:41 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Nov 11 at 20:22 | |||||
| Nov 11 at 18:46 | history | closed |
naturallyInconsistent Matt Hanson Miyase |
Needs details or clarity | |
| Nov 11 at 15:35 | comment | added | Alex Marshall | But why is the question marked as closed twice? | |
| Nov 11 at 8:25 | comment | added | naturallyInconsistent | That's much better; you should have put that into the question! | |
| Nov 11 at 8:23 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 11 at 18:46 | |||||
| Nov 11 at 8:18 | comment | added | Alex Marshall | In particular figure 10 which is directly related to my question (and spin squeezing representation of N atoms on a Bloch sphere). | |
| Nov 11 at 8:12 | comment | added | Alex Marshall | That is not true. The Dicke states subspace fits on a N/2 radius sphere. Basically all N spins point in the same direction and the Hamiltonian interacting with them is symmetric with respect to the total spin. That is how spin-squeezing is done i.e. interacting with the overall spin of a system. See for example the discussion in arxiv.org/abs/2106.13234 | |
| Nov 11 at 8:07 | comment | added | naturallyInconsistent | A single spin-half particle's state space is one Bloch sphere. Even just two spin-half atoms no longer fit into one Bloch sphere. I cannot be sure that you understand what it is you are trying to do. | |
| Nov 11 at 7:58 | history | asked | Alex Marshall | CC BY-SA 4.0 |