Skip to main content
31 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 7 at 7:16 answer added Damian timeline score: 0
Nov 7 at 4:43 answer added Rococo timeline score: 1
Nov 6 at 14:30 answer added Cort Ammon timeline score: 5
Nov 6 at 13:30 answer added klfjhgfkl timeline score: 6
Nov 6 at 7:49 comment added KingLogic The fields that permeates the vacuum of space doesn't have a well defined mass.
S Nov 6 at 7:33 history suggested CommunityBot CC BY-SA 4.0
remove social & meta commentary, improve language & format, reduce redundancy
Nov 6 at 7:18 answer added Toffomat timeline score: 1
Nov 6 at 6:23 review Suggested edits
S Nov 6 at 7:33
Nov 6 at 1:09 answer added EvilSnack timeline score: -2
Nov 5 at 20:17 answer added Radovan Garabík timeline score: 8
Nov 5 at 13:18 history edited Dale CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Nov 5 at 12:53 answer added Gaussian97 timeline score: 14
Nov 5 at 8:55 comment added user1079505 I think a better wording would be "are there objects for which mass is undefined".
Nov 5 at 8:50 answer added jpa timeline score: 10
Nov 5 at 8:37 history became hot network question
Nov 5 at 8:32 history reopened Mike_bb
GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90
John Rennie
Nov 5 at 3:45 review Reopen votes
Nov 5 at 8:32
Nov 4 at 20:50 history closed ZeroTheHero
Matt Hanson
Miyase
Needs details or clarity
Nov 4 at 18:57 comment added James There is a similar riddle "I weigh nothing, but you can still see me. If you put me in a bucket, I make the bucket lighter. What am I?" [Answer: A hole]
Nov 4 at 18:17 review Close votes
Nov 4 at 20:50
Nov 4 at 18:11 vote accept Mike_bb
Nov 4 at 18:00 comment added John Rennie The question seemed clear to me ...
Nov 4 at 17:58 comment added Vincent Thacker @Mike_bb Then edit your question as such. It is currently very unclear.
Nov 4 at 17:57 comment added Mike_bb @Steeven I completely agree with you. You understand what I mean. I meant case when property of mass cannot be defined.
Nov 4 at 17:53 comment added Steeven It sounds like you are asking when the property of mass cannot be defined. That atoms do not have a temperature is due to how temperature is defined. A single atom does not "have a temperature" due to how temperature is defined - it is a measure of how a large amount of particles behaves. If you don't have a large amount of particles, then it isn't defined. The same could be said about friction or pressure. Asking for the temperature of an atom is like asking for the number of apples in an atom. It is not a meaningful concept. And you are asking for a similar idea for mass, if I'm right.
Nov 4 at 17:52 answer added John Rennie timeline score: 36
Nov 4 at 17:52 comment added Mike_bb @JonCuster Photons have mass. It's zero mass. But I ask about something that doesn't have mass (neither zero nor other).
Nov 4 at 17:50 comment added Mike_bb @VincentThacker I mean it's something that exists in physical area but has neither zero nor other mass.
Nov 4 at 17:49 comment added Jon Custer How does having zero mass mean it has mass? Photons have zero mass. They don’t have mass…
Nov 4 at 17:44 comment added Vincent Thacker What do you mean by "thing"? What is your criteria for "thing"? Do dreams and thoughts have mass? Is this even a question about physics?
Nov 4 at 17:41 history asked Mike_bb CC BY-SA 4.0