Timeline for Is there anything for which mass is undefined?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
31 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 7 at 7:16 | answer | added | Damian | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 7 at 4:43 | answer | added | Rococo | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 6 at 14:30 | answer | added | Cort Ammon | timeline score: 5 | |
Nov 6 at 13:30 | answer | added | klfjhgfkl | timeline score: 6 | |
Nov 6 at 7:49 | comment | added | KingLogic | The fields that permeates the vacuum of space doesn't have a well defined mass. | |
S Nov 6 at 7:33 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
remove social & meta commentary, improve language & format, reduce redundancy
|
Nov 6 at 7:18 | answer | added | Toffomat | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 6 at 6:23 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Nov 6 at 7:33 | |||||
Nov 6 at 1:09 | answer | added | EvilSnack | timeline score: -2 | |
Nov 5 at 20:17 | answer | added | Radovan Garabík | timeline score: 8 | |
Nov 5 at 13:18 | history | edited | Dale | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
Nov 5 at 12:53 | answer | added | Gaussian97 | timeline score: 14 | |
Nov 5 at 8:55 | comment | added | user1079505 | I think a better wording would be "are there objects for which mass is undefined". | |
Nov 5 at 8:50 | answer | added | jpa | timeline score: 10 | |
Nov 5 at 8:37 | history | became hot network question | |||
Nov 5 at 8:32 | history | reopened |
Mike_bb GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90 John Rennie |
||
Nov 5 at 3:45 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Nov 5 at 8:32 | |||||
Nov 4 at 20:50 | history | closed |
ZeroTheHero Matt Hanson Miyase |
Needs details or clarity | |
Nov 4 at 18:57 | comment | added | James | There is a similar riddle "I weigh nothing, but you can still see me. If you put me in a bucket, I make the bucket lighter. What am I?" [Answer: A hole] | |
Nov 4 at 18:17 | review | Close votes | |||
Nov 4 at 20:50 | |||||
Nov 4 at 18:11 | vote | accept | Mike_bb | ||
Nov 4 at 18:00 | comment | added | John Rennie | The question seemed clear to me ... | |
Nov 4 at 17:58 | comment | added | Vincent Thacker | @Mike_bb Then edit your question as such. It is currently very unclear. | |
Nov 4 at 17:57 | comment | added | Mike_bb | @Steeven I completely agree with you. You understand what I mean. I meant case when property of mass cannot be defined. | |
Nov 4 at 17:53 | comment | added | Steeven | It sounds like you are asking when the property of mass cannot be defined. That atoms do not have a temperature is due to how temperature is defined. A single atom does not "have a temperature" due to how temperature is defined - it is a measure of how a large amount of particles behaves. If you don't have a large amount of particles, then it isn't defined. The same could be said about friction or pressure. Asking for the temperature of an atom is like asking for the number of apples in an atom. It is not a meaningful concept. And you are asking for a similar idea for mass, if I'm right. | |
Nov 4 at 17:52 | answer | added | John Rennie | timeline score: 36 | |
Nov 4 at 17:52 | comment | added | Mike_bb | @JonCuster Photons have mass. It's zero mass. But I ask about something that doesn't have mass (neither zero nor other). | |
Nov 4 at 17:50 | comment | added | Mike_bb | @VincentThacker I mean it's something that exists in physical area but has neither zero nor other mass. | |
Nov 4 at 17:49 | comment | added | Jon Custer | How does having zero mass mean it has mass? Photons have zero mass. They don’t have mass… | |
Nov 4 at 17:44 | comment | added | Vincent Thacker | What do you mean by "thing"? What is your criteria for "thing"? Do dreams and thoughts have mass? Is this even a question about physics? | |
Nov 4 at 17:41 | history | asked | Mike_bb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |