Timeline for Can nonimaging optics concentrate heat to a higher temperature than the source? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 25 at 13:36 | history | closed |
Bob D Miyase Jon Custer |
Needs more focus | |
Oct 25 at 11:47 | review | Close votes | |||
Oct 25 at 13:36 | |||||
Oct 25 at 10:11 | history | edited | timblack1 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added guess about the reason no "hot spot" was visible, and a method for testing this reason
|
Oct 25 at 9:59 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 25 at 9:59 | comment | added | timblack1 | @JohnRennie I edited the question to add the definition you requested. The system might not be reversible to the extent the jar's internal mirrored surface is more reflective and less absorptive than the black dot inside the jar. | |
Oct 25 at 9:59 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 25 at 9:55 | history | edited | timblack1 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added link to Wikipedia non-imaging optics page, made explicit the jar's mirrored interior & internal black body are non-imaging optical components
|
Oct 25 at 5:31 | comment | added | John Rennie | Any form of reversible optics suffers from the same problem that if light rays can travel in reverse the hotter side will heat the cooler side so the image can never be hotter than the object. You need to define what you mean by "non-imaging optics" and why whatever system you mean might not be reversible. | |
Oct 25 at 4:56 | history | edited | timblack1 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected minor grammatical error
|
S Oct 25 at 4:54 | review | First questions | |||
Oct 25 at 5:31 | |||||
S Oct 25 at 4:54 | history | asked | timblack1 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |