Timeline for What if a probably non wave equation, satisfies the wave equation? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 2, 2013 at 12:42 | history | closed |
user17320 Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir John Rennie Qmechanic♦ |
Needs details or clarity | |
Nov 2, 2013 at 11:47 | vote | accept | Thanos | ||
Nov 2, 2013 at 11:35 | answer | added | lionelbrits | timeline score: 3 | |
Nov 2, 2013 at 11:34 | comment | added | Thanos | @MichaelBrown: Thank you very much for your comment. I have reprhased my question. I hope my point is clear now. | |
Nov 2, 2013 at 11:33 | history | edited | Thanos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
Nov 2, 2013 at 11:17 | review | Close votes | |||
Nov 2, 2013 at 12:42 | |||||
Nov 2, 2013 at 10:59 | comment | added | Michael | It is hard to tell what you are asking here. I think the first time you say "equation" you mean "function," and what do you mean by "Does it necessarily mean that it is a wave equation?" And what is a "potential wave"? A function of the form you describe obeys a certain kind of wave equation (describing waves with velocity $-a/b$), but whether it is physical or not depends entirely on the context of what you're trying to describe. | |
Nov 2, 2013 at 10:48 | history | asked | Thanos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |