Timeline for What mathematical results support the idea that the wavefunction does not evolve unitarily before the experimenter interacts with the system?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13 at 9:56 | history | edited | Amit | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fix problem with parentheses
|
| Oct 12 at 18:10 | answer | added | Bill Alsept | timeline score: -1 | |
| Oct 12 at 16:05 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
res. recom. qs can usually not be mixed wth an actual physics q
|
| Oct 12 at 15:50 | answer | added | Ken Wharton | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 12 at 14:55 | answer | added | alanf | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 12 at 14:38 | history | edited | Ryder Rude | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 46 characters in body
|
| Oct 12 at 14:32 | history | edited | Ryder Rude | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Oct 12 at 14:22 | history | edited | Ryder Rude | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Oct 12 at 14:19 | comment | added | Ryder Rude | @ConnorBehan A hidden variable theory would claim realism at all times. The latter scenario introduces realism at some moments (i.e. after measurement), and unitary evolution for others. So the no-go theorems to hidden variables theories don't apply | |
| Oct 12 at 14:18 | comment | added | Connor Behan | Isn't the latter just a hidden variable scenario? | |
| Oct 12 at 14:14 | history | edited | Ryder Rude | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Oct 12 at 14:08 | history | asked | Ryder Rude | CC BY-SA 4.0 |