Skip to main content
Fixed grammar and orthography. Not sure if I preserved the OP's meaning, feel free to improve.
Source Link
Vincent Thacker
  • 12.9k
  • 14
  • 41
  • 52

I am writing my college thesis about Gödel's article "A New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation"A New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation.

As far as I had understood, there are important geometric objects such as $x^0$-lines (spatially stationary particle world lines), closed timelike curves (or Gödel's helix as I like to call it) and three-spaces, but I cannot figure out what is Kurt Gödel exactly referring to when he writes "world lines of matter". As he claims in this article, he uses this object to talk about some properties of his solution, properties 2 and 6 to be precise, but when he writes property 8 and its proof it is critical to understand, both formally and heuristically, the very nature of this object.

Pardon me if I am too emphatical, maybe my English is not good enough to write in a more relaxed and elegant manner.

Thanks for your help.

I am writing my college thesis about Gödel's article "A New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation".

As far as I had understood, there are important geometric objects such as $x^0$-lines (spatially stationary particle world lines), closed timelike curves (or Gödel's helix as I like to call it) and three-spaces, but I cannot figure out what is Kurt Gödel exactly referring to when he writes "world lines of matter". As he claims in this article, he uses this object to talk about some properties of his solution, properties 2 and 6 to be precise, but when he writes property 8 and its proof it is critical to understand, both formally and heuristically, the very nature of this object.

Pardon me if I am too emphatical, maybe my English is not good enough to write in a more relaxed and elegant manner.

Thanks for your help.

I am writing my college thesis about Gödel's article A New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation.

As far as I had understood, there are important geometric objects such as $x^0$-lines (spatially stationary particle world lines), closed timelike curves (or Gödel's helix as I like to call it) and three-spaces, but I cannot figure out what is Kurt Gödel exactly referring to when he writes "world lines of matter". As he claims in this article, he uses this object to talk about some properties of his solution, properties 2 and 6 to be precise, but when he writes property 8 and its proof it is critical to understand, both formally and heuristically, the very nature of this object.

Pardon me if I am too emphatical, maybe my English is not good enough to write in a more relaxed and elegant manner.

Fixed grammar and orthography. Not sure if I preserved the OP's meaning, feel free to improve.
Source Link

ImI am writing my college thesis about Gödel's article "A New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation".

As far as I had undestandunderstood, there are important geometric objectobjects such as $x^0$-lines (spatialspatially stationary particle world lines), closed timelike curves (or Gödel's helix as I like to call it) and three-spaces, but I cantcannot figure out what is Kurt Gödel exactly refferingreferring to when he writes "world lines of matter". As he claims in this article, he uses this object to talk about some of properties of his solution, properties 2 and 6 to be precise, but when he writes propertieproperty 8 and its proof it is critical to understand, both formally and heuristically, the very nature of this object.

Pardon me if I am being too emphatical, maybe my englishEnglish is not as good enough to write in a more relaxed and ellegantelegant manner.

Thanks for your help.

Im writing my college thesis about Gödel's article "A New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation".

As far as I had undestand, there are important geometric object such as $x^0$-lines (spatial stationary particle world lines), closed timelike curves (or Gödel's helix as I like to call it) and three-spaces, but I cant figure out what is Kurt exactly reffering to when he writes "world lines of matter". As he claims in this article, he uses this object to talk about some of properties of his solution, properties 2 and 6 to be precise, but when he writes propertie 8 and its proof is critical to understand, both formally and heuristically, the very nature of this object.

Pardon me if I am being too emphatical, maybe my english is not as good to write in a more relaxed and ellegant manner.

Thanks for your help.

I am writing my college thesis about Gödel's article "A New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation".

As far as I had understood, there are important geometric objects such as $x^0$-lines (spatially stationary particle world lines), closed timelike curves (or Gödel's helix as I like to call it) and three-spaces, but I cannot figure out what is Kurt Gödel exactly referring to when he writes "world lines of matter". As he claims in this article, he uses this object to talk about some properties of his solution, properties 2 and 6 to be precise, but when he writes property 8 and its proof it is critical to understand, both formally and heuristically, the very nature of this object.

Pardon me if I am too emphatical, maybe my English is not good enough to write in a more relaxed and elegant manner.

Thanks for your help.

typos and formatting corrected
Source Link
Hyperon
  • 7.3k
  • 3
  • 12
  • 26

What exactly is Göedel refferingGödel referring to when he says "world lines of matter" in his 1949 article about his solution to Einstein Field Equations?

Im writing my college thesis about Gödel's article "A New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation".

As far as I had undestand, there are important geometric object such as x^0$x^0$-lines (spatial stationary particle world lines), closed timelike curves (or Gödel's helix as I like to call it) and three-spaces, but I cant figure out what is Kurt exactly reffering to when he writes "world lines of matter". As he claims in this article, he uses this object to talk about some of properties of his solution, properties 2 and 6 to be precise, but when he writes propertie 8 and its proof is critical to understand, both formally and heuristically, the very nature of this object.

Pardon me if I am being too emphatical, maybe my english is not as good to write in a more relaxed and ellegant manner.

Thanks for your help.

What exactly is Göedel reffering to when he says "world lines of matter" in his 1949 article about his solution to Einstein Field Equations?

Im writing my college thesis about Gödel's article "A New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation".

As far as I had undestand, there are important geometric object such as x^0-lines (spatial stationary particle world lines), closed timelike curves (or Gödel's helix as I like to call it) and three-spaces, but I cant figure out what is Kurt exactly reffering to when he writes "world lines of matter". As he claims in this article, he uses this object to talk about some of properties of his solution, properties 2 and 6 to be precise, but when he writes propertie 8 and its proof is critical to understand, both formally and heuristically, the very nature of this object.

Pardon me if I am being too emphatical, maybe my english is not as good to write in a more relaxed and ellegant manner.

Thanks for your help.

What exactly is Gödel referring to when he says "world lines of matter" in his 1949 article about his solution to Einstein Field Equations?

Im writing my college thesis about Gödel's article "A New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation".

As far as I had undestand, there are important geometric object such as $x^0$-lines (spatial stationary particle world lines), closed timelike curves (or Gödel's helix as I like to call it) and three-spaces, but I cant figure out what is Kurt exactly reffering to when he writes "world lines of matter". As he claims in this article, he uses this object to talk about some of properties of his solution, properties 2 and 6 to be precise, but when he writes propertie 8 and its proof is critical to understand, both formally and heuristically, the very nature of this object.

Pardon me if I am being too emphatical, maybe my english is not as good to write in a more relaxed and ellegant manner.

Thanks for your help.

Source Link
Loading