Timeline for How does a black hole look from the inside (isn't there a paradox, here)? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29 at 22:49 | comment | added | Camion | Well... An answer might be non mainstream, but a question is just a question. If it makes incorrect assumption, it is the role of those who answer to correct them - otherwise what would be the purpose of this site ? Blocking a question because it is non mainstream gives the feeling that people censor the question because they do not understand it and are not able to explain what is wrong in it but they have the diffuse feeling that it contradicts their credo. | |
| Sep 27 at 10:14 | history | left closed in review |
benrg Miyase Vincent Thacker |
Original close reason(s) were not resolved | |
| Sep 27 at 8:19 | comment | added | PM 2Ring | Your question is still non-mainstream because of your points 2 & 3. You may be interested in the Cosmological natural selection hypothesis (also called the fecund universes) proposed by Lee Smolin. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_natural_selection | |
| S Sep 27 at 7:00 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Sep 27 at 10:14 | |||||
| S Sep 27 at 7:00 | history | edited | Camion | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
found material contradicting the claim that this is not mainstream physics
Added to review
|
| Sep 15 at 4:03 | comment | added | safesphere | “explain why James Webb Telescope see impossible galaxies” - This is the easy part. When observations don’t match the predictions of the theory, the theory is considered wrong and is discarded to be replaced by a better one. In this case the theory in question is the Friedman cosmology a.k.a. FLRW or Lambda-CDM. This model has been in crisis for a long time with the “dark energy” nonsense, “axis of evil”, Hubble constant discrepancy, and so on. It is long overdue to R.I.P. in the trash bin. | |
| Sep 13 at 0:12 | comment | added | Yukterez | If you raytrace inside a black hole you see a lot, so your premise is wrong. For an animation that shows how two observers send photons to each other inside the horizon see here. | |
| Sep 12 at 16:24 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 12 at 12:24 | comment | added | m4r35n357 | See here for lots of videos and explanations jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh - as other have said, your assumptions are way off and cannot be used to predict anything. | |
| Sep 12 at 12:23 | history | closed |
PM 2Ring Dale Miyase |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Sep 12 at 11:21 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 12 at 12:23 | |||||
| Sep 12 at 10:49 | comment | added | Prahar | "According to theory" <-- which theory? | |
| Sep 12 at 10:10 | answer | added | Andrew Steane | timeline score: 12 | |
| Sep 12 at 9:31 | history | asked | Camion | CC BY-SA 4.0 |