Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 11 at 23:06 answer added Maury Markowitz timeline score: 2
Sep 6 at 19:51 answer added Juan Ignacio Gil timeline score: 3
Sep 6 at 10:37 comment added Igor F. In addition to the reasons you quote for $Q_{econ}$ vs. $Q_{eng}$, the cost of the fuel might play a role. For example, what is the cost of the diamond shells ("high density carbon", HDC) needed in inertial confinement fusion? I have no idea...
Sep 5 at 23:28 comment added Mark Practical fusion is 20 years away, and has been since the 1940s.
Sep 5 at 20:48 comment added Sophie Swett You write that it's "not clear to [you] what the distinction is between engineering break even and economic break even," but your description of that distinction seems very good!
Sep 5 at 19:01 answer added KDP timeline score: 2
Sep 5 at 17:59 comment added thegreatemu Part of economic break even is recouping the costs of construction. If the profits from selling generated power are small compared to the initial investment, then the expected time-to-break-even is long. If that time is longer than the expected lifetime of the plant, you will never break even fiscally.
Sep 5 at 15:00 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
S Sep 5 at 14:58 history suggested Alan B CC BY-SA 4.0
Missing a 'we' and a '?' in the title.
Sep 5 at 14:53 review Suggested edits
S Sep 5 at 14:58
Sep 5 at 13:54 answer added Andréas Sundström timeline score: 11
Sep 5 at 12:26 history became hot network question
Sep 5 at 4:45 answer added naturallyInconsistent timeline score: 4
Sep 5 at 3:48 answer added RC_23 timeline score: 11
Sep 5 at 2:37 history asked Jagerber48 CC BY-SA 4.0