Skip to main content
Post Closed as "Duplicate" by Bob D, David Bailey, John Rennie energy
added 121 characters in body
Source Link
entropy
  • 138
  • 7

One end of an unstretched vertical spring is attached to the ceiling and an object attached to the other end is slowly lowered to its equilibrium position. If S be gain in spring energy and G be loss in gravitational potential energy in the process, then

This was the problem I was trying to solve. I first did it without the law of energy conservation. For equilibrium position we get, $mg = kx$ (gravitational force balances the spring force at equilibrium)

Putting the value of x in $1/2kx^2$... (where x is the deformation in the spring at equilibrium) I end up with the relation G = 2S (the right answer).

How do I go about applying energy conservation in this situation?

$mgx = 1/2kx^2$ (K.E. not considered as the block is lowered slowly)

This gives S=G as the answer. I know I'm making some error while applying energy conservation.

Is there some non-conservative force acting on the block? In that case we can't apply energy conservation, right? But I can only see the spring force and the gravitational force (and also the force applied by the external agent to slowly lower it). Should I also be considering the force applied by the external agent? If so, how do I go about this?

This problem may be silly but it has been troubling me for quite a while. Any help will be appreciated.

One end of an unstretched vertical spring is attached to the ceiling and an object attached to the other end is slowly lowered to its equilibrium position. If S be gain in spring energy and G be loss in gravitational potential energy in the process, then

This was the problem I was trying to solve. I first did it without the law of energy conservation. For equilibrium position we get, $mg = kx$

Putting the value of x in $1/2kx^2$... I end up with the relation G = 2S (the right answer).

How do I go about applying energy conservation in this situation?

$mgx = 1/2kx^2$ (K.E. not considered as the block is lowered slowly)

This gives S=G as the answer. I know I'm making some error while applying energy conservation.

Is there some non-conservative force acting on the block? In that case we can't apply energy conservation, right? But I can only see the spring force and the gravitational force (and also the force applied by the external agent to slowly lower it). Should I also be considering the force applied by the external agent? If so, how do I go about this?

This problem may be silly but it has been troubling me for quite a while. Any help will be appreciated.

One end of an unstretched vertical spring is attached to the ceiling and an object attached to the other end is slowly lowered to its equilibrium position. If S be gain in spring energy and G be loss in gravitational potential energy in the process, then

This was the problem I was trying to solve. I first did it without the law of energy conservation. For equilibrium position we get, $mg = kx$ (gravitational force balances the spring force at equilibrium)

Putting the value of x in $1/2kx^2$... (where x is the deformation in the spring at equilibrium) I end up with the relation G = 2S (the right answer).

How do I go about applying energy conservation in this situation?

$mgx = 1/2kx^2$ (K.E. not considered as the block is lowered slowly)

This gives S=G as the answer. I know I'm making some error while applying energy conservation.

Is there some non-conservative force acting on the block? In that case we can't apply energy conservation, right? But I can only see the spring force and the gravitational force (and also the force applied by the external agent to slowly lower it). Should I also be considering the force applied by the external agent? If so, how do I go about this?

This problem may be silly but it has been troubling me for quite a while. Any help will be appreciated.

edited tags
Link
Bob D
  • 77.9k
  • 6
  • 58
  • 152
Source Link
entropy
  • 138
  • 7

Energy Conservation Spring Problem

One end of an unstretched vertical spring is attached to the ceiling and an object attached to the other end is slowly lowered to its equilibrium position. If S be gain in spring energy and G be loss in gravitational potential energy in the process, then

This was the problem I was trying to solve. I first did it without the law of energy conservation. For equilibrium position we get, $mg = kx$

Putting the value of x in $1/2kx^2$... I end up with the relation G = 2S (the right answer).

How do I go about applying energy conservation in this situation?

$mgx = 1/2kx^2$ (K.E. not considered as the block is lowered slowly)

This gives S=G as the answer. I know I'm making some error while applying energy conservation.

Is there some non-conservative force acting on the block? In that case we can't apply energy conservation, right? But I can only see the spring force and the gravitational force (and also the force applied by the external agent to slowly lower it). Should I also be considering the force applied by the external agent? If so, how do I go about this?

This problem may be silly but it has been troubling me for quite a while. Any help will be appreciated.