Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 31 at 22:23 vote accept InexperiencedCoder
Jul 31 at 22:23 comment added InexperiencedCoder @JánLalinský Okay, that makes a lot more sense. I never really accounted for them being separate ideas. Thanks!
Jul 31 at 18:04 comment added Ján Lalinský @InexperiencedCoder On the surface, the Ohm law $\vec{j} = \sigma \vec{E}$ does not hold. So only inside the conductor, zero current implies zero electric field and zero charge density. On the surface, we can have zero current and non-zero electric field and non-zero charge density.
Jul 31 at 17:29 comment added InexperiencedCoder @my2cts That's internally though? There's still charges on the surface, which have electric fields with a vector perpendicular to the wire. - I may be getting myself confused now with ignorable details.
Jul 31 at 15:54 comment added my2cts In a conductor ${\vec j} = \sigma {\vec E}$. So ${\vec E}=0$ implies ${\vec j} =0$.
Jul 31 at 15:40 comment added InexperiencedCoder @my2cts I thought that it is the resistance in the static copper wire which causes internal fields, for example, that stop all of the charges making their way to the surface like in a 'Perfect conductor'
Jul 31 at 15:28 history edited InexperiencedCoder CC BY-SA 4.0
More question
Jul 30 at 22:22 comment added my2cts ‘ copper, gold, aliminium has resistance … therefore there remains a field within the conductor.’ Only if there is a current.
Jul 30 at 21:13 history edited InexperiencedCoder CC BY-SA 4.0
added 300 characters in body
Jul 29 at 22:43 answer added Ján Lalinský timeline score: 2
S Jul 29 at 20:50 review First questions
Jul 30 at 0:32
S Jul 29 at 20:50 history asked InexperiencedCoder CC BY-SA 4.0