Timeline for A paradox while explaining the equilibrium of books
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16 at 6:47 | vote | accept | Nightwing | ||
| Jul 15 at 21:37 | answer | added | Steeven | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 15 at 20:20 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags
|
| Jul 15 at 2:31 | comment | added | philipxy | "Neglecting the fact that the situation is symmetrical ... the net upward force balancing weight for both is different" This cannot be, since it is symmetrical so when ignoring that it is the situation must be consistent with it. How do you justify this? The reasoning in the sentence is not clear. (If by "neglecting" you are trying to say "assuming it's not symmetrical", that is poor writing & describes a different case than this one so it doesn't tell you about this case.) | |
| Jul 15 at 1:01 | history | became hot network question | |||
| S Jul 14 at 17:13 | history | suggested | CompassBearer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Readability, added tag
|
| Jul 14 at 17:12 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 14 at 17:13 | |||||
| Jul 14 at 17:09 | history | edited | Nightwing | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
| Jul 14 at 17:09 | answer | added | CompassBearer | timeline score: 18 | |
| Jul 14 at 17:08 | comment | added | Nightwing | By Newton's third law if friction acts upwards on one surface it must act downwards on the other surface in contact | |
| Jul 14 at 17:07 | comment | added | trula | I can't see why you think "the fact that friction acts in opposite directions" The friction works upwards in all books, | |
| Jul 14 at 17:00 | history | asked | Nightwing | CC BY-SA 4.0 |