Timeline for How to expand $(D_\mu\Phi)^\dagger(D^\mu\Phi)$ in $SU(2)$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 13 at 19:59 | vote | accept | Hendriksdf5 | ||
Jul 13 at 15:49 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 6 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
Jul 13 at 14:21 | answer | added | Cosmas Zachos | timeline score: 2 | |
Jul 12 at 15:11 | comment | added | Hendriksdf5 | For the two middle terms I get $\frac{ig}{2}[\Phi^\dagger\tau^a A^a_\mu,\partial^\mu]\Phi$ and for the last term using $\tau^a\tau^b = \delta^{ab} 1 + i \epsilon^{abc} \tau^c$, $\frac{g^2}{4}[\Phi^\dagger A^a_\mu A^{a\mu}\Phi + i \Phi^\dagger \epsilon^{abc} \tau^c A^a_\mu A^{b\mu} \Phi$] is this korrekt? @CosmasZachos | |
S Jul 12 at 14:31 | history | suggested | Gabriel Ybarra Marcaida |
Homework tag
|
|
Jul 12 at 13:14 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 12 at 14:31 | |||||
Jul 12 at 13:11 | comment | added | Cosmas Zachos | Antidistribute the two middle terms and condense the evident anticommutator of the Pauli matrices in the last term. | |
Jul 12 at 13:10 | history | edited | Cosmas Zachos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Jul 12 at 9:07 | history | asked | Hendriksdf5 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |