Timeline for Time-evolution operator in QFT
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 25 at 12:10 | vote | accept | Andrea | ||
Jun 24 at 15:33 | history | edited | Valter Moretti | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Jun 24 at 15:09 | history | edited | Valter Moretti | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
Jun 24 at 15:05 | comment | added | Valter Moretti | YES: When you integrate $T_{00}$ over the rest space $\Sigma$ in $d^3x$, the $\vec{x}$ dependence disappears and the $t$ dependence disappears as well because the integral is a constant of motion. That is true also for the $\phi^4(x)$ model, of course. | |
Jun 24 at 13:10 | comment | added | Andrea | Asking cause a common example to get Feynman rule in the books is to use the interaction $\phi^4$ so in this case it depends on $\phi(x)$ and then on $t$ indirectly through $x$ | |
Jun 24 at 13:04 | comment | added | Andrea | About homogeneity of time, does that mean $H$ indirectly depends on the 4-vector $x$ and then on t, through the field $\phi(x)$, but in the end it's a constant of motion? In other words, does in this case the Hamiltonian can still depend indirectly on time? | |
Jun 24 at 12:17 | history | edited | Valter Moretti | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 231 characters in body
|
Jun 24 at 10:11 | history | answered | Valter Moretti | CC BY-SA 4.0 |