Timeline for At what size of matter does the second law of thermodynamics breakdown?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 19 at 4:31 | comment | added | FlatterMann | I think there is a misconception about thermodynamics here. TD is a timeless theory. You are asking a question that is tied to an arbitrarily chosen time scale. If you make your measurement integration time longer, then smaller systems will behave as expected. If you make it infinitely short, then not even the largest systems will appear to be in equilibrium. | |
Jun 19 at 3:10 | answer | added | Allure | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 19 at 2:57 | history | reopened |
mmesser314 Vincent Thacker David Bailey |
||
Jun 18 at 21:02 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags
|
Jun 18 at 20:55 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Jun 19 at 2:57 | |||||
Jun 18 at 20:55 | comment | added | mmesser314 | Voting to reopen. This is clear. Large collections of atoms can be well predicted by probability. Small collections have more variability. At what size does the variability get so big that we would likely not see the expected heat flow. | |
Jun 18 at 19:10 | history | closed |
Bob D Matt Hanson Miyase |
Needs details or clarity | |
Jun 18 at 18:41 | comment | added | Chemomechanics | See also the links in Does Fluctuation Theorem prove the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics?. | |
Jun 18 at 17:11 | comment | added | g s | There are some false assumptions in your question. Please read this Q and its answers and see if it addresses your question. physics.stackexchange.com/q/491179 | |
Jun 18 at 17:07 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 18 at 19:10 | |||||
S Jun 18 at 15:38 | review | First questions | |||
Jun 18 at 16:16 | |||||
S Jun 18 at 15:38 | history | asked | Meth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |