Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 19 at 4:31 comment added FlatterMann I think there is a misconception about thermodynamics here. TD is a timeless theory. You are asking a question that is tied to an arbitrarily chosen time scale. If you make your measurement integration time longer, then smaller systems will behave as expected. If you make it infinitely short, then not even the largest systems will appear to be in equilibrium.
Jun 19 at 3:10 answer added Allure timeline score: 1
Jun 19 at 2:57 history reopened mmesser314
Vincent Thacker
David Bailey
Jun 18 at 21:02 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 4.0
edited tags
Jun 18 at 20:55 review Reopen votes
Jun 19 at 2:57
Jun 18 at 20:55 comment added mmesser314 Voting to reopen. This is clear. Large collections of atoms can be well predicted by probability. Small collections have more variability. At what size does the variability get so big that we would likely not see the expected heat flow.
Jun 18 at 19:10 history closed Bob D
Matt Hanson
Miyase
Needs details or clarity
Jun 18 at 18:41 comment added Chemomechanics See also the links in Does Fluctuation Theorem prove the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics?.
Jun 18 at 17:11 comment added g s There are some false assumptions in your question. Please read this Q and its answers and see if it addresses your question. physics.stackexchange.com/q/491179
Jun 18 at 17:07 review Close votes
Jun 18 at 19:10
S Jun 18 at 15:38 review First questions
Jun 18 at 16:16
S Jun 18 at 15:38 history asked Meth CC BY-SA 4.0