Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 15 at 13:05 comment added Dan Bullard I posted a very specific answer and the "powers that be" deleted it, it's pointless for me to expound on this topic, they will just delete my words. Watch my videos, read my books or read my articles on LinkedIn linkedin.com/in/dan-bullard-8213046/recent-activity/articles
Jun 14 at 6:23 comment added Lorenzo Pompili I don't need mathematical or physical context from other sources. I would need more context concerning the specific sentence (the precise paragraph from the lectures, etc...) to understand what he meant by that. Why don't you just provide context yourself, if you want to know what people think about your ideas? Also, sorry to disagree, but what you are doing is publishing a post online, citing sentences from other sources completely out of context, and accusing people of flat-earth thinking when raising doubts and asking for more context... Who is the flat-earther here again?
Jun 13 at 13:08 comment added Dan Bullard Then buy Feynman's books and buy my books, read them. That will give you plenty of context.
Jun 11 at 16:10 comment added Lorenzo Pompili A statement is provably false if it is stated objectively. "Is not very sensitive" coud mean a lot of things depending on the context. That is why I say I don't fully understand his sentence, I would need more context.
Jun 11 at 11:08 comment added Dan Bullard So the spectrum of an impulse and the spectrum of white noise IS admittedly identical, and the human ear CAN tell the difference but despite Feynman saying that the ear is not very sensitive to the one thing that differentiates the two, he wasn't wrong. Got it. When someone says something that is provably false, it doesn't prove they were wrong. Sound like Flat Earth thinking to me.
Jun 10 at 8:28 history answered Lorenzo Pompili CC BY-SA 4.0