Skip to main content
added 58 characters in body
Source Link
Níckolas Alves
  • 23k
  • 3
  • 36
  • 109

This paper seems to suggest that the interior metric for a black hole in particular (a.k.a not a different kind of spherically symmetric non-rotating body) is just the exterior Schwarzschild metric but with the $t$ and $r$ coordinates switched. But this doesn’t seem right because the interior metric should really look more like the interior Schwarzschild metric. Am I missing something important here?

Here is the equation: $$ds^2=-(\frac{2M}{t}-1)^{-1}dt^2+(\frac{2M}{t}-1)dr^2+t^2d\Omega^2.$$$$\mathrm{d}s^2=-\left(\frac{2M}{t}-1\right)^{-1}\mathrm{d}t^2+\left(\frac{2M}{t}-1\right)\mathrm{d}r^2+t^2\mathrm{d}\Omega^2.$$

This paper seems to suggest that the interior metric for a black hole in particular (a.k.a not a different kind of spherically symmetric non-rotating body) is just the exterior Schwarzschild metric but with the $t$ and $r$ coordinates switched. But this doesn’t seem right because the interior metric should really look more like the interior Schwarzschild metric. Am I missing something important here?

Here is the equation: $$ds^2=-(\frac{2M}{t}-1)^{-1}dt^2+(\frac{2M}{t}-1)dr^2+t^2d\Omega^2.$$

This paper seems to suggest that the interior metric for a black hole in particular (a.k.a not a different kind of spherically symmetric non-rotating body) is just the exterior Schwarzschild metric but with the $t$ and $r$ coordinates switched. But this doesn’t seem right because the interior metric should really look more like the interior Schwarzschild metric. Am I missing something important here?

Here is the equation: $$\mathrm{d}s^2=-\left(\frac{2M}{t}-1\right)^{-1}\mathrm{d}t^2+\left(\frac{2M}{t}-1\right)\mathrm{d}r^2+t^2\mathrm{d}\Omega^2.$$

added 3 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

This paper seems to suggest that the interior metric for a black hole in particular (a.k.a not a different kind of spherically symmetric non-rotating body) is just the exterior Schwarzschild metric but with the $t$ and $r$ coordinates switched. But this doesn’t seem right because the interior metric should really look more like the interior Schwarzschild metric. Am I missing something important here?

Here is the equation: $ds^2=-(\frac{2M}{t}-1)^{-1}dt^2+(\frac{2M}{t}-1)dr^2+t^2d\Omega^2$$$ds^2=-(\frac{2M}{t}-1)^{-1}dt^2+(\frac{2M}{t}-1)dr^2+t^2d\Omega^2.$$

This paper seems to suggest that the interior metric for a black hole in particular (a.k.a not a different kind of spherically symmetric non-rotating body) is just the exterior Schwarzschild metric but with the $t$ and $r$ coordinates switched. But this doesn’t seem right because the interior metric should really look more like the interior Schwarzschild metric. Am I missing something important here?

Here is the equation: $ds^2=-(\frac{2M}{t}-1)^{-1}dt^2+(\frac{2M}{t}-1)dr^2+t^2d\Omega^2$

This paper seems to suggest that the interior metric for a black hole in particular (a.k.a not a different kind of spherically symmetric non-rotating body) is just the exterior Schwarzschild metric but with the $t$ and $r$ coordinates switched. But this doesn’t seem right because the interior metric should really look more like the interior Schwarzschild metric. Am I missing something important here?

Here is the equation: $$ds^2=-(\frac{2M}{t}-1)^{-1}dt^2+(\frac{2M}{t}-1)dr^2+t^2d\Omega^2.$$

Changed link to paper from pdf to abstract page
Source Link

ThisThis paper seems to suggest that the interior metric for a black hole in particular (a.k.a not a different kind of spherically symmetric non-rotating body) is just the exterior Schwarzschild metric but with the $t$ and $r$ coordinates switched. But this doesn’t seem right because the interior metric should really look more like the interior Schwarzschild metric. Am I missing something important here?

Here is the equation: $ds^2=-(\frac{2M}{t}-1)^{-1}dt^2+(\frac{2M}{t}-1)dr^2+t^2d\Omega^2$

This paper seems to suggest that the interior metric for a black hole in particular (a.k.a not a different kind of spherically symmetric non-rotating body) is just the exterior Schwarzschild metric but with the $t$ and $r$ coordinates switched. But this doesn’t seem right because the interior metric should really look more like the interior Schwarzschild metric. Am I missing something important here?

Here is the equation: $ds^2=-(\frac{2M}{t}-1)^{-1}dt^2+(\frac{2M}{t}-1)dr^2+t^2d\Omega^2$

This paper seems to suggest that the interior metric for a black hole in particular (a.k.a not a different kind of spherically symmetric non-rotating body) is just the exterior Schwarzschild metric but with the $t$ and $r$ coordinates switched. But this doesn’t seem right because the interior metric should really look more like the interior Schwarzschild metric. Am I missing something important here?

Here is the equation: $ds^2=-(\frac{2M}{t}-1)^{-1}dt^2+(\frac{2M}{t}-1)dr^2+t^2d\Omega^2$

added 98 characters in body
Source Link
user345249
  • 343
  • 1
  • 4
Loading
Source Link
user345249
  • 343
  • 1
  • 4
Loading