Timeline for What are the fields produced around a current carrying conductor?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
32 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jul 11, 2020 at 16:32 | history | suggested | user240345 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Question was written in place of answer
|
Jul 11, 2020 at 8:20 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 11, 2020 at 16:32 | |||||
S Jan 20, 2018 at 13:06 | history | suggested | Thomas Abshier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
elaborated on concept of dipole cancellation of E field, and corrected grammar
|
Jan 19, 2018 at 18:03 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jan 20, 2018 at 13:06 | |||||
Nov 12, 2017 at 1:23 | history | edited | Sensebe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 92 characters in body
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Dec 14, 2014 at 16:47 | answer | added | kotozna | timeline score: 4 | |
Oct 1, 2014 at 16:56 | history | edited | Sensebe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 694 characters in body
|
Oct 1, 2014 at 16:50 | history | edited | Sensebe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 694 characters in body
|
Feb 17, 2014 at 21:39 | history | protected | Qmechanic♦ | ||
Feb 17, 2014 at 18:54 | answer | added | Avo | timeline score: 7 | |
Dec 17, 2013 at 13:05 | comment | added | user31782 | Would there be electric field around the current carrying conductor, even when DC source is used? Here is the answer. The point is that for maintaining $\vec E$ inside wire it requires a variable surface charge density i.e. the quasi-neutrality is destroyed making the wire charged hence a minor $\vec E$ is observed outside the wire too. | |
S Nov 4, 2013 at 4:51 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Nov 4, 2013 at 4:51 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Nov 3, 2013 at 7:52 | answer | added | Jeffrey Bonde | timeline score: 5 | |
Nov 2, 2013 at 14:29 | history | edited | Sensebe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Explanation on the problem is improved.
|
Nov 2, 2013 at 6:05 | comment | added | anna v | I am an experimentalist. There do not exist appreciable electric fields outside current carrying wires. We are all doing the experiment continually just by typing on the computer to communicate on this page. There would be sparks continually. So we can only talk of fields smaller than the ionization energy of air, or our skin. | |
Nov 2, 2013 at 5:38 | history | edited | Sensebe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarity on the problem is taken up to standards.
|
Nov 2, 2013 at 3:02 | history | edited | Sensebe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Link has been added.
|
Nov 1, 2013 at 12:25 | history | edited | Sensebe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Explanation is given more clarity on the problem of the concept.
|
Oct 30, 2013 at 13:27 | history | edited | Sensebe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
Oct 29, 2013 at 21:53 | answer | added | David | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 27, 2013 at 11:39 | comment | added | user28737 | a bit Related | |
S Oct 27, 2013 at 3:21 | history | bounty started | Sensebe | ||
S Oct 27, 2013 at 3:21 | history | notice added | Sensebe | Draw attention | |
Oct 26, 2013 at 20:47 | history | edited | Sensebe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 261 characters in body
|
Oct 26, 2013 at 18:51 | history | edited | Sensebe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 293 characters in body
|
Oct 21, 2013 at 10:56 | comment | added | MSalters | Presumably, since this is not a superconductor, there's a electric field inside the conductor - why are these electrons flowing? That field cannot sharply end at the edge of the conductor. | |
Oct 21, 2013 at 6:32 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/392176434481225728 | ||
Oct 21, 2013 at 6:19 | answer | added | timq1 | timeline score: -1 | |
Oct 21, 2013 at 6:18 | history | edited | Sensebe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Oct 21, 2013 at 6:12 | history | asked | Sensebe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |