Timeline for Mirror image Electric field and potential
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29 at 2:57 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body; edited tags; edited tags
|
| Apr 28 at 21:49 | comment | added | AXensen | Griffiths "introduction to electrodynamics" gives a really good description of the logic behind image charges. | |
| Apr 28 at 21:37 | history | edited | freecharly | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improved the text to make it better understandable.
|
| Apr 28 at 19:12 | history | reopened |
freecharly gandalf61 Thomas Fritsch |
||
| Apr 28 at 17:27 | comment | added | freecharly | I think that the wording of the question needs improvement. But, in essence, the question doesn't seem to be a homework, but aims at the principle of why the image charge method gives a correct answer for the electric potential and field. | |
| Apr 28 at 17:27 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Apr 28 at 19:12 | |||||
| Apr 28 at 17:11 | history | closed |
Bob D Matt Hanson Hyperon |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Apr 28 at 16:46 | answer | added | freecharly | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 28 at 16:26 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 28 at 17:11 | |||||
| Apr 28 at 16:20 | comment | added | my2cts | See physics.stackexchange.com/q/74745 | |
| Apr 28 at 16:18 | comment | added | my2cts | Who wrote your book and what is the title? | |
| Apr 28 at 15:49 | history | edited | Manvendra Singh Gehlot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Apr 28 at 15:48 | history | asked | Manvendra Singh Gehlot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |