Timeline for Can you naïvely reduce the dimensionality of a QFT?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 25 at 17:30 | vote | accept | TopoLynch | ||
| S Apr 25 at 17:30 | vote | accept | TopoLynch | ||
| S Apr 25 at 17:30 | |||||
| Apr 25 at 17:30 | vote | accept | TopoLynch | ||
| S Apr 25 at 17:30 | |||||
| Apr 25 at 0:06 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Apr 24 at 18:21 | answer | added | Níckolas Alves | timeline score: 10 | |
| Apr 24 at 17:59 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 24 at 17:46 | answer | added | Hans Moleman | timeline score: 13 | |
| Apr 24 at 16:52 | comment | added | By Symmetry | Lets go simpler. Can you ignore the angular coordinate in the hydrogen atom and only consider the radial component? | |
| Apr 24 at 16:39 | comment | added | mmesser314 | This might help - A simple and rigorous proof of 26/10 dimensions in string theory ... does not exist. | |
| Apr 24 at 15:59 | history | asked | TopoLynch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |