Timeline for Exact analytical solution for the surface gravity of an oblate spheroid
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26 at 1:52 | history | edited | KDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 105 characters in body
|
| Sep 20 at 22:36 | vote | accept | KDP | ||
| Mar 16 at 21:28 | history | edited | KDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Mar 16 at 7:49 | history | edited | KDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 15 characters in body
|
| Mar 16 at 7:25 | history | edited | KDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Mar 16 at 6:54 | history | edited | KDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 154 characters in body
|
| Mar 15 at 12:06 | history | edited | KDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 15 at 5:35 | answer | added | Ghoster | timeline score: 8 | |
| Mar 14 at 15:06 | history | edited | KDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 14 at 1:47 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 74 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Mar 13 at 23:09 | history | edited | KDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 109 characters in body
|
| Mar 13 at 23:06 | history | reopened |
Sten StephenG - Help Ukraine Yukterez |
||
| Mar 13 at 22:55 | history | edited | KDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed links and corrected typo in second equation. Defined the parameters.
|
| Mar 13 at 22:31 | comment | added | Triatticus | If you include descriptions of variables, don't put them into the comments, just edit them into your question so it can be more clear and self contained. Furthermore you can do better at linking previous questions by using the actual link functionality of the site, just provide author and name of papers/questions along with the links so they can be reconstructed in case of link rot. | |
| Mar 13 at 22:28 | comment | added | KDP | @Sten There are only 5 parameters: M for mass, "a" is the semi-major axis of the elliptical cross section of the oblate. "e" is the eccentricity of the oblate. "z" is the vertical distance from the equatorial plane and "r" is the horizontal distance from the vertical rotation axis of the point on the surface of the oblate.. | |
| Mar 13 at 22:24 | comment | added | KDP | The potential is obtained geometrically for a spheroid that uniform density, similar to how Newton derived the equation for his shell theorem. This is Newtonian analysis and there is no rotation involved. Just a rigid object that happens to be oblate. | |
| Mar 13 at 22:06 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Mar 13 at 23:10 | |||||
| Mar 13 at 22:02 | history | edited | KDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Limited to one question and removed references to dark matter. Please reopen as I think my answer is a valuable resource.
|
| Mar 13 at 21:54 | answer | added | KDP | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 13 at 21:52 | history | closed |
Mauricio Sten StephenG - Help Ukraine |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Mar 13 at 21:06 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 13 at 21:56 | |||||
| Mar 13 at 20:51 | comment | added | AXensen | Here is an article which refutes these claims. I am not an expert in GR so I don't really know how to assess these claims. But my linked article is peer reviewed, and the one wikipedia cites is not. I sent the article claiming galactic rotation is solved by GR to a friend who is an expert in GR, and without having spent a lot of time carefully checking, he said it "seems a bit crackpot" journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/… | |
| Mar 13 at 20:49 | comment | added | Lucas Baldo | What is your question? | |
| Mar 13 at 20:38 | history | asked | KDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |