Timeline for Planck Length vs Size of objects that exhibit quantum behaviour
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28 at 11:54 | comment | added | Rabbi Kaii | Thank you @user34722! Yes, a video from 3Blue1Brown is PERFECT | |
| Feb 28 at 11:16 | comment | added | Níckolas Alves | Oh, I just noticed user34722's video comes from 3Blue1Brown. I agree with his comment that this is a very good and reliable YouTube channel. | |
| Feb 28 at 11:15 | comment | added | Níckolas Alves | @RabbiKaii I don't think I can give a good reference on this (maybe the video pointed out by user34722 will be helpful, I don't know). I don't recall even a textbook mentioning this in this form and it is something I learned by doing QM in practice. It is kind of immediate when you know QM, but perhaps difficult to perceive when you don't know QM. As for $G$ and $c$, they simply don't show up in the usual QM equations. $c$ only occurs when relativistic effects are taken into account and $G$ only occurs in gravitational settings. | |
| Feb 28 at 8:22 | comment | added | user34722 | It's pretty dense, so might be worth watching twice! It explains some very important concepts that are relevant to engineering and math as well as physics. | |
| Feb 28 at 8:05 | comment | added | user34722 | I bet this video will answer your question: youtube.com/watch?v=MBnnXbOM5S4&ab_channel=3Blue1Brown. This is a very good, reliable YouTube channel, and it looks like they have multiple videos related to quantum mechanics. | |
| Feb 27 at 22:14 | comment | added | Rabbi Kaii | Thanks. Could you point me to some further reading so I can understand your first paragraph better, as well as why G and c are irrelevant? Not a textbook, I am not that good, but possibly a more advanced for-physics-enthusiasts work? | |
| Feb 27 at 22:11 | history | answered | Níckolas Alves | CC BY-SA 4.0 |