Timeline for Why impose constraints in (Path Integral) Quantization of Proca action?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20 at 6:23 | comment | added | Hyperon | It is often easier to study the differential operator in Fourier space, where it becomes a multiplication operator. See e.g. physics.stackexchange.com/q/798235 for the general method to find the inverse of such an operator acting on a vector field (checking at the same time if it exists). Similarly, this can be down for the more complicated case of a Rarita-Schwinger field. | |
| Feb 20 at 1:53 | vote | accept | baba26 | ||
| Feb 20 at 1:53 | comment | added | baba26 | Thanks. Is there a way to check ( for a more complicated theory in my case ) that the path integral takes care of all the constraints coming from equations of motion? Perhaps by checking that the operator between the V has no zero mode??? | |
| Feb 19 at 22:06 | history | answered | Hyperon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |