Timeline for Outer product as an operator in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16 at 21:00 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Feb 16 at 17:37 | vote | accept | Oscarcillo | ||
| Feb 16 at 17:05 | comment | added | Tobias Fünke | I have written an answer and removed my previous comments for that reason. | |
| Feb 16 at 15:35 | history | edited | Tobias Fünke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 16 at 14:56 | history | edited | Tobias Fünke |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 16 at 14:44 | answer | added | Tobias Fünke | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 16 at 12:50 | comment | added | Oscarcillo | My question is that the projector operator can be defined as the outer product of two vectors, as you said, because there exists the ismorphism that I mentioned. But if in infinte dimensions the ismorphism breaks, then why can we still define it in this way? | |
| Feb 16 at 10:00 | history | asked | Oscarcillo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |