Timeline for Is Dark Matter really invisible?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 6 at 7:52 | comment | added | Confuse-ray30 | Yes, but that's not what the question is about. We can never rule out anything in the way this question is asked. Will the theta angle of qcd ever be confirmed 0? No. Will the charge of gravity ever be confirmed to be the mass in the force? No. So saying can something be so small that it is simply not observed is a non-question to me, since the answer will always be yes. And you're more aware than I am why these small interactions still need to be big enough to see observable condequences. (Such as in structure formation) | |
Feb 5 at 21:40 | comment | added | CharlieB | I'd have to disagree with this pretty strongly - I've made a career searching for hypothetical tiny interactions of dark matter with hadronic matter, have a look at ultra-light dark matter and bosonic scalar fields | |
Feb 5 at 15:57 | comment | added | Gilbert | I believe @Jonathan was referring to the commonly pejorative connotation of "pedantic." | |
Feb 5 at 13:14 | comment | added | Confuse-ray30 | I did not feel offended | |
Feb 5 at 12:56 | comment | added | Jonathan | Sorry if the way I formulated my question offended you, it was not my intention. Thank you for you answer. | |
S Feb 5 at 11:43 | review | First answers | |||
Feb 5 at 12:01 | |||||
S Feb 5 at 11:43 | history | answered | Confuse-ray30 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |