Timeline for Does Hawking radiation depend of what's inside a black hole?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 25 at 21:11 | comment | added | Ghoster | Why is the Schwarzschild black hole a vacuum solution? | |
Jan 25 at 21:04 | comment | added | Ghoster | That’s not true. | |
Jan 25 at 20:06 | comment | added | Independent Physics | @Ghoster In every black hole there is an star... so no vacuum... | |
Jan 25 at 6:14 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
Jan 25 at 5:37 | answer | added | Michael C. | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 25 at 4:02 | answer | added | fermionicplants | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 25 at 1:39 | comment | added | FlatterMann | I think Ghoster got it 100% right. The curious thing about fundamental physics is that we seem to be dealing with the properties of nothing. | |
Jan 24 at 23:54 | comment | added | Ghoster | properties of its interior The interior is vacuum. | |
Jan 24 at 23:20 | history | asked | Independent Physics | CC BY-SA 4.0 |