Skip to main content
Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by hft, Jon Custer, Miyase
added 4 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

I lately have been confused by the work energy theorem which states that:

Work done by all the forces on an object is equal to the change in kinetic energy.

However, I have a doubt

Consider we have an object resting on the ground. We lift the object from the group and bring it to a height say h$h$. We ensure that the work done in bringing the object above the ground is done without giving it any velocity (By applying a force F = mg + dF$F = mg + dF$, where dF > 0$dF > 0$). Now  , the work done by gravity = -mgh. (h<<R). Now  , applying Work energy-energy theorem:

δ(K.E) = -mgh (neglecting air friction)

But in this case , change in Kinetic energy will be zero... hence implying that mgh = 0  , and h = 0 but this is not the case.

So could anyone please tell me what am I doing wrong here?

I lately have been confused by the work energy theorem which states that:

Work done by all the forces on an object is equal to the change in kinetic energy.

However, I have a doubt

Consider we have an object resting on the ground. We lift the object from the group and bring it to a height say h. We ensure that the work done in bringing the object above the ground is done without giving it any velocity (By applying a force F = mg + dF, where dF > 0). Now  , the work done by gravity = -mgh. (h<<R). Now  , applying Work energy theorem:

δ(K.E) = -mgh (neglecting air friction)

But in this case , change in Kinetic energy will be zero... hence implying that mgh = 0  , and h = 0 but this is not the case.

So could anyone please tell me what am I doing wrong here?

I lately have been confused by the work energy theorem which states that:

Work done by all the forces on an object is equal to the change in kinetic energy.

However, I have a doubt

Consider we have an object resting on the ground. We lift the object from the group and bring it to a height say $h$. We ensure that the work done in bringing the object above the ground is done without giving it any velocity (By applying a force $F = mg + dF$, where $dF > 0$). Now, the work done by gravity = -mgh. (h<<R). Now, applying Work-energy theorem:

δ(K.E) = -mgh (neglecting air friction)

But in this case , change in Kinetic energy will be zero... hence implying that mgh = 0, and h = 0 but this is not the case.

So could anyone please tell me what am I doing wrong here?

Source Link
Adhway
  • 374
  • 2
  • 11

Work-Energy Theorem - A conceptual doubt

I lately have been confused by the work energy theorem which states that:

Work done by all the forces on an object is equal to the change in kinetic energy.

However, I have a doubt

Consider we have an object resting on the ground. We lift the object from the group and bring it to a height say h. We ensure that the work done in bringing the object above the ground is done without giving it any velocity (By applying a force F = mg + dF, where dF > 0). Now , the work done by gravity = -mgh. (h<<R). Now , applying Work energy theorem:

δ(K.E) = -mgh (neglecting air friction)

But in this case , change in Kinetic energy will be zero... hence implying that mgh = 0 , and h = 0 but this is not the case.

So could anyone please tell me what am I doing wrong here?