Timeline for Two-point-correlation in the 3D ising model
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4 at 18:17 | vote | accept | Dorek | ||
| Jan 4 at 18:17 | comment | added | Dorek | Oh of course. I am blind, sorry. Thank you a lot! | |
| Jan 4 at 18:05 | comment | added | Yvan Velenik | The magnetic susceptibility (up to a factor $kT$). (The precise definition is given in the other answer of mine you refer to in your post.) | |
| Jan 4 at 17:21 | comment | added | Dorek | I have one more question, does it mean then, that the sum over all 2-point functions is what one would consider the general correlation of the spins in the system? What is the name of that quantity? | |
| Jan 4 at 17:16 | comment | added | Dorek | ok i see, i think my big misunderstanding was, that i am actually looking at two fixed points. Because my next step will be to recode my ising model into the Blume-Capel model, to later look at a correlation between a spin on a surface and one inside the bulk, this obviously only makes sense for two fixed spins. Thank you! | |
| Jan 4 at 16:45 | history | answered | Yvan Velenik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |