Skip to main content

Timeline for Composing beam splitters

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 21, 2023 at 13:32 history edited Quantum Mechanic CC BY-SA 4.0
changed notation of eta matrix from theta to eta
Dec 21, 2023 at 13:31 comment added Quantum Mechanic @Quantastic the boldface was just for emphasis, not to mean anything about notation. The part in bold is the part you can use input-output theory to calculate and will turn into a linear combination of operators of the form $a^\dagger b$, etc
Dec 21, 2023 at 11:26 comment added Quantastic alright, this makes sense! Just out of curiosity, did you mean to type that part of the last equation in boldface?
Dec 20, 2023 at 14:37 comment added Quantum Mechanic @Quantastic you can just do $UV=UVU^\dagger U$ and use BCH to find $UVU^\dagger$. It won't be very nice though. There is nothing wrong with leaving the channel as $UV$ - that might be the easiest form! Then if you want derivatives for QFI or something, it's just $\partial U_\theta V_\eta /\partial \eta=U_\theta \partial V_\eta/\partial \eta$, etc, for which you just need this input-output theory to find $\partial U_\theta V_\eta /\partial \eta=U_\theta (a^\dagger c+a c^\dagger)i V_\eta=\boldsymbol{U_\theta (a^\dagger c+a c^\dagger)U_\theta^\dagger} \times i U_\theta V_\eta$
Dec 20, 2023 at 1:45 comment added Quantastic I guess the point is that I am more interested in the channel itself than its application to any specific state (for example, to calculate things such as its distance to other channels, the QFI, etc.).
Dec 19, 2023 at 23:14 comment added Quantastic Thank you for your answer, it is definitely useful. However, you touch on the thing that interests me the most only in your last paragraph: how do you write $U$ using the BCH formula? Do you just the approximation $e^Ae^B\cong e^{A+B+\frac12[A,B]}$?
Dec 19, 2023 at 21:01 history answered Quantum Mechanic CC BY-SA 4.0