Timeline for EMI in non-conducting materials?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2023 at 18:37 | answer | added | Qwerty | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 6, 2023 at 16:10 | comment | added | Vansh Pandey | @DKNguyen let me try again, i wanted to ask assuming that non conducting materials are taken into consideration, can EMF be induced in them as per EMI's laws? Because magnetic flux says no where that material should be conducting for it to be defined and hence EMF should also be induced in non conducting materials, thats what i thought so needed clarification. | |
| Dec 6, 2023 at 15:24 | comment | added | DKNguyen | It sounded to me like you were asking whether something has truly zero effects, while simultaneously using some idealizations (which cannot truly exist). | |
| Dec 6, 2023 at 6:57 | comment | added | Vansh Pandey | @DKNguyen thank you for answering, but sorry i dont understand why did you take the topic from what i asked to whether "non-conducting" materials exist or not(did i frame my question incorrectly?), i wasn't the one who drew the line between conducting and non-conducting, it was physics and its approach, non conducting materials are just assumptions to understand the real scenarios layer by layer; I wanted to know the answer to my question under that assumption only. | |
| Dec 6, 2023 at 5:56 | comment | added | DKNguyen | What is "non-conducting", really? No material has infinite resistance, so where do you draw the line between conducting and non-conducting? All materials will conduct charges at sufficiently high voltages. The fields generated by neutron stars should be strong enough to rip charged particles, electrons or otherwise, out of any matter you can encounter on Earth. But you can't expect a simple textbook to be bogged down by scenarios that are so extreme and exotic that they are not measurable in any earth bound case I can think of. | |
| Dec 6, 2023 at 5:38 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Consider to spell out acronyms. | |
| Dec 6, 2023 at 5:31 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title; edited tags
|
| S Dec 6, 2023 at 5:30 | history | suggested | MrDBrane | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added "electric-fields" tag and fixed some English mistakes, thought still needs editing. Not well written.
|
| Dec 6, 2023 at 5:21 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 6, 2023 at 5:30 | |||||
| S Dec 6, 2023 at 4:17 | review | First questions | |||
| Dec 6, 2023 at 5:21 | |||||
| S Dec 6, 2023 at 4:17 | history | asked | Vansh Pandey | CC BY-SA 4.0 |