Skip to main content
added 3 characters in body
Source Link

I have been trying to figure out the solution to this problem of finding the "velocity" of de-Broglie's wave. I have tried to see answers from countless sources but none of them helped. My book provides me with the solution that : v = (hf)/(mc) . Where m is the mass of particle , f is the frequency, h is Planck constant and c is speed of light.

And this came from the fact that they used the formula c = f×(lambda) and substituted it in de-Broglie's equation for wavelength of a particle (= h/p) , which is really absurd to me as to why does the speed of light come here? Shouldn't it be v(wave)= f×(lambda) . Now I've also read that it has something to do with group velocity of matter waves but none of the sources which I read really explained as to why speed of light should be at play here. Can anyone explain this?

Thanks :)

I have been trying to figure out the solution to this problem of finding the "velocity" of de-Broglie's wave. I have tried to see answers from countless sources but none of them helped. My book provides me with the solution that : v = (hf)/(mc) Where m is the mass of particle , f is the frequency, h is Planck constant and c is speed of light.

And this came from the fact that they used the formula c = f×(lambda) and substituted it in de-Broglie's equation for wavelength of a particle (= h/p) , which is really absurd to me as to why does the speed of light come here? Shouldn't it be v(wave)= f×(lambda) . Now I've also read that it has something to do with group velocity of matter waves but none of the sources which I read really explained as to why speed of light should be at play here. Can anyone explain this?

Thanks :)

I have been trying to figure out the solution to this problem of finding the "velocity" of de-Broglie's wave. I have tried to see answers from countless sources but none of them helped. My book provides me with the solution that : v = (hf)/(mc) . Where m is the mass of particle , f is the frequency, h is Planck constant and c is speed of light.

And this came from the fact that they used the formula c = f×(lambda) and substituted it in de-Broglie's equation for wavelength of a particle (= h/p) , which is really absurd to me as to why does the speed of light come here? Shouldn't it be v(wave)= f×(lambda) . Now I've also read that it has something to do with group velocity of matter waves but none of the sources which I read really explained as to why speed of light should be at play here. Can anyone explain this?

Thanks :)

added 94 characters in body
Source Link

I have been trying to figure out the solution to this problem of finding the "velocity" of de-Broglie's wave. I have tried to see answers from countless sources but none of them helped. My book provides me with the solution that : v = (hf)/(mc) Where m is the mass of particle , f is the frequency, h is Planck constant and c is speed of light.

And this came from the fact that they used the formula c = f×(lambda) and substituted it in de-Broglie's equation for wavelength of a particle (= h/p) , which is really absurd to me as to why does the speed of lightspeed of light come here? Shouldn't it be v(wave)= f×(lambda) . Now I've also read that it has something to do with group velocity of matter wavesgroup velocity of matter waves but none of the sources which I read really explained as to why speed of light should be at play here. Can anyone explain this?

Thanks :)

I have been trying to figure out the solution to this problem of finding the "velocity" of de-Broglie's wave. I have tried to see answers from countless sources but none of them helped. My book provides me with the solution that : v = (hf)/(mc) Where m is the mass of particle , f is the frequency, h is Planck constant and c is speed of light.

And this came from the fact that they used the formula c = f×(lambda), which is really absurd to me as to why does the speed of light come here? Shouldn't it be v(wave)= f×(lambda) . Now I've also read that it has something to do with group velocity of matter waves but none of the sources which I read really explained as to why speed of light should be at play here. Can anyone explain this?

Thanks :)

I have been trying to figure out the solution to this problem of finding the "velocity" of de-Broglie's wave. I have tried to see answers from countless sources but none of them helped. My book provides me with the solution that : v = (hf)/(mc) Where m is the mass of particle , f is the frequency, h is Planck constant and c is speed of light.

And this came from the fact that they used the formula c = f×(lambda) and substituted it in de-Broglie's equation for wavelength of a particle (= h/p) , which is really absurd to me as to why does the speed of light come here? Shouldn't it be v(wave)= f×(lambda) . Now I've also read that it has something to do with group velocity of matter waves but none of the sources which I read really explained as to why speed of light should be at play here. Can anyone explain this?

Thanks :)

added 5 characters in body
Source Link

I have been trying to figure out the solution to this problem of finding the "velocity" of de-Broglie's wave. I have tried to see answers from countless sources but none of them helped. My book provides me with the solution that : v = (hf)/(mc) Where m is the mass of particle , f is the frequency, h is Planck constant and c is speed of light.

And this came from the fact that they used the formula c = f×(lambda), which is really absurd to me as to why does the speed of light come here? Shouldn't it be v(wave)= f*(lambda)v(wave)= f×(lambda) . Now I've also read that it has something to do with group velocity of matter waves but none of the sources which I read really explained as to why speed of light should be at play here. Can anyone explain this?

Thanks :)

I have been trying to figure out the solution to this problem of finding the "velocity" of de-Broglie's wave. I have tried to see answers from countless sources but none of them helped. My book provides me with the solution that : v = (hf)/(mc) Where m is the mass of particle , f is the frequency, h is Planck constant and c is speed of light.

And this came from the fact that they used the formula c = f×(lambda), which is really absurd to me as to why does the speed of light come here? Shouldn't it be v(wave)= f*(lambda). Now I've also read that it has something to do with group velocity of matter waves but none of the sources which I read really explained as to why speed of light should be at play here. Can anyone explain this?

Thanks :)

I have been trying to figure out the solution to this problem of finding the "velocity" of de-Broglie's wave. I have tried to see answers from countless sources but none of them helped. My book provides me with the solution that : v = (hf)/(mc) Where m is the mass of particle , f is the frequency, h is Planck constant and c is speed of light.

And this came from the fact that they used the formula c = f×(lambda), which is really absurd to me as to why does the speed of light come here? Shouldn't it be v(wave)= f×(lambda) . Now I've also read that it has something to do with group velocity of matter waves but none of the sources which I read really explained as to why speed of light should be at play here. Can anyone explain this?

Thanks :)

edited body
Source Link
Loading
added 1 character in body
Source Link
Loading
deleted 8 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Post Undeleted by Neelansh Goyal
Post Deleted by Neelansh Goyal
Source Link
Loading